Live data from Hacker News

Starbase, LA

spacex.com

611–620 of 641 posts

Re: Starbase, LA

#611
post #226

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is incredibly overstated. There are "incentives" for all sorts of activities. These incentives were available to all manufacturers. We should have "incentives" to produce electric vehicles and manufacturing in America. Insane not to. And these incentives are often "you would normally have to pay us X million in taxes, but we'll let you pay less". When the alternative is something not being built and no tax reven…

> In 2019, the loss was $862 million, but for 2020 there is a huge profit of $721 million. > However: A closer look at the figures published last week shows that Tesla is still making losses with actual sales of electric cars - around $500,000 in 2020. > In 2020, carbon certificates brought in $1.6 billion, without this revenue the numbers would still be below red. https://www.electrichunter.com/ev-news/tesla-makes-m…

Also available to other companies

Re: Starbase, LA

#612
post #359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tesla would be nothing without Musk. That doesn't take away from Eberhard and Tarpenning; they started the company after all and are great engineers. But it would be nothing without Musk.

The people who tried something different and did the work on batteries weren’t Musk. That’s the comment I was responding to. Musk has been a good showman though, and he seems to be a genius financial engineer with a cult following

That's Straubel, sorry

Re: Starbase, LA

#613

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you're technically correct, but IIUC Tesla is still the most delivered (customers taking delivery) EV brand in China. Draw what conclusions you will from that fun fact

Isn't that wholesale which does not always land to customer sales? Honestly I don't know much about all of this.

It's not wholesale

Re: Starbase, LA

#614

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you’re demonstrating how far your head is in the sand Interesting. Perhaps ironic? If only society cared about genuinely good people like they seem to care about Musk. It's puzzling.

I want to be clear: I don’t care about Musk as a person. I care about facts. I care about achievements. Just the same as saying Israel is committing genocide is not antisemitism, saying Musk has achieved incredible things is not caring about or supporting him. Both cases are simply stating facts without any judgement or show of support/not support.

Isreal isn't committing genocide though. It's clear to anyone who isn't innumerate that it's implausible

Re: Starbase, LA

#615

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As both you and I said, Elon talks big and has failed to deliver on a ton of things That does not mean he has achieved nothing incredible. If John Carmack or Tim Cook or Henry Ford said they were going to make cheap, reliable fusion reactors in every home but never did, they would still be the legends they are for the things they did do successfully. The things they didn’t do don’t change what they did. The two are u…

Why are you listing other people that you imagine you wouldn’t mind if they were habitual liars

Because people have failures and successes and when the successes are bigger than the failure we consider that a success

Re: Starbase, LA

#616
post #33

A way to get back at Texas for datacenter restrictions? Ten pads and thousands of flights per year sure will accelerate Golden Dome, err... I mean "going to Mars"

SpaceX just got $8B more for it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Dome_(missile_defense_s...

That's just not true

Re: Starbase, LA

#617

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> SpaceX is the most successful Musk company because it is the one he has the LEAST direct involvement with. > Gwynne Shotwell is the actual reason SpaceX is as successful as it it. Weird take. If you read any of the biographies or books about SpaceX, you would know that many key personnel at SpaceX (e.g. Tom Mueller [1], Hans Koeniggsman[2], Tim Buzza [3], Jim Cantrell[4], Garrett Reisman [5]) have all mentioned his…

We are talking about the same moron who made the Cybertruck fiasco. I can only imagine how many people told Musk how bad of an idea it was to make a body out of hard stainless steel, and how he probably fired them all. and he shut down one of Twitters data centers after being told not to by the engineers who built Twitter. This directly caused many outages because the IP addresses of that data center were hard coded…

Linus Pauling

Nobel syndrome

Re: Starbase, LA

#618

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok. The OP wrote: > You're being down-voted (and so shall I) but I think you're right. Despite all the animosity towards him, Musk is doing things that are economically meaningful for our nation. In the context of the US building big things, ramping up manufacturing, doing Space exploration, &c. and the person I replied to wrote: > Musk has done a huge amount to put us INTO this situation What situation did he put us…

It'd be nice if his companies paid the tax they owe. https://itep.org/elon-musk-spacex-tax-breaks-doge/

They certainly are

Re: Starbase, LA

#619
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which situation did Elon Musk put us in to? Can you elaborate? When did this situation start? What happened? What did he personally do that put us in the situation?

One such example - he's using his massive wealth and influence to support fascist political movements that promise mass deportation and "remigration", and even supporting these policies explicitly himself. In the US, his political beneficiaries have managed to "achieve" net negative migration to the US for the first time in 50 years, and the first decline in overall population in US history . If this becomes the new…

South Africa?

Re: Starbase, LA

#620

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The wetlands around Cape Canaveral/Kennedy are thriving. Men with guns prevent people from getting too close to the rockets, and people do far more damage to wetlands than a rocket launch once every few days. A rocket launch every hour or so as SpaceX is promising might be quite different.

Kennedy is also surrounded my federally protected land. SpaceX? Noooope. Never trust Elon.

Why don't you check a map of the area?
Post reply on HN