Pnpm 12.0
pnpm.io
Pnpm 12.0
1–10 of 72 posts
Re: Pnpm 12.0
#2Am I the only one that hates the decision to no longer support corepack?
Re: Pnpm 12.0
#3Am I the only one that hates the decision to no longer support corepack?
Same here. Corepack was fine and there is already too much churn
Re: Pnpm 12.0
#4Am I the only one that hates the decision to no longer support corepack?
First I'm hearing of it, and it does dampen my enthusiasm for v12 a bit.
Re: Pnpm 12.0
#5Good to see the maintainers don't care enough to take the time to write a release blogpost themselves. sigh
Re: Pnpm 12.0
#6Am I the only one that hates the decision to no longer support corepack?
Is "pnpm installs the other package managers" what you're talking about, or something else? That doesn't quite read like removing corepack support to me, though I might be missing something obvious.
Re: Pnpm 12.0
#7The more I read these ass Claude Opus writings the more I believe AGI is further away from us.
Re: Pnpm 12.0
#8> It is a rewrite of pnpm in Rust
Their benchmarks[0] report that a clean install with lockfile is about 3x times faster (7s -> 2.2s) and a no-op install is about 29x times faster (517ms -> 18ms)
Re: Pnpm 12.0
#9Hooray!
Re: Pnpm 12.0
#10Good to see the maintainers don't care enough to take the time to write a release blogpost themselves. sigh
I was also bothered by this. I don't care if you use LLMs to write most or all of your code, but at least have the courtesy of actually writing your blog posts & readmes, to demonstrate that you at least understand what the LLM generated for you.