[dead]
GLM-5.3-Flash
491–500 of 605 posts
Re: GLM-5.3-Flash
#492Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is the harness that you're using? I found that GLM-5.2 was pretty happy helping me reverse engineer/hack devices. Maybe the system prompt you're injecting is making it refuse?
> Maybe the system prompt you're injecting is making it refuse? No, this has nothing to do with my harness. I use one of the most popular open-source harnesses available. > I found that GLM-5.2 was pretty happy helping me reverse engineer/hack devices. This is a completely different category of things than what I'm getting refusals on, so I'm not sure why you're bringing it up.
Uh, actively trying to hack an embedded device that runs Linux over the network, specifically an IP security camera, could be considered red teaming, no?
You never mentioned which exact activities you were getting flagged on and getting refused.
Re: GLM-5.3-Flash
#493Earlier quoted context omitted.
They tell you, and allow you to opt out in certain plans.
Except when their automated reviews decides that you've written something dangerous, in which case they'll use it for training. And no, they won't tell you what their automated reviews consider "dangerous".
And neither will they make clear what "analytical purposes" is for the data you can't opt out of.
So they give you the ability to "opt-out" of "training purposes", and then you still share everything for analytical purposes (which you can't opt out of). It's a smart tactic on their side if they are contributing to cultural discourse on this to keep the straw man focus on training data.
And also to have the popular AI straw man: that your data isn't valuable and oh man they're losing so much money on tokens and giving you a subsidy, so you you better use up your entire subscription balance weekly/daily/every 5h putting in all your "worthless" data that you miss out otherwise (FOMO). Oh man only way it could get worse is if they implemented gambling slots psychology.
Re: GLM-5.3-Flash
#494Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Maybe the system prompt you're injecting is making it refuse? No, this has nothing to do with my harness. I use one of the most popular open-source harnesses available. > I found that GLM-5.2 was pretty happy helping me reverse engineer/hack devices. This is a completely different category of things than what I'm getting refusals on, so I'm not sure why you're bringing it up.
Uh, actively trying to hack an embedded device that runs Linux over the network, specifically an IP security camera, could be considered red teaming, no? You never mentioned which exact activities you were getting flagged on and getting refused.
> Uh, actively trying to hack an embedded device that runs Linux over the network, specifically an IP security camera, could be considered red teaming, no?
No. Vendors (and their model guardrails) do, indeed, treat those as separate from pentesting non-embedded infrastructure, and that is because they are very different activities.
And, if you actually read my comment, it says "red team my own computers". That's categorically different from pentesting an IP camera.
> You never mentioned which exact activities you were getting flagged on and getting refused.
Because further details than those I've provided aren't relevant, and it's clearly different from what you're doing.
Your experience isn't relevant to my situation.
Re: GLM-5.3-Flash
#495You guys read Z.ai's terms of service, right? Broad and perpetual license over inputs and outputs, and even your name and profile picture. Vague prohibitions on whatever may harm Z.ai’s "interests" or even the "national interests" of any country. Vague prohibitions on "disturbing" or "inappropriate" content, whatever that is. Vague prohibitions on discussing Z.ai, even my posting this comment violates it. Can ban you…
Isn’t the point with these open models that you find a provider with the right terms of use/data sovereignty for you and get it from them?
Re: GLM-5.3-Flash
#496Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most US companies that have anything to do with government, finance, medical, etc. already have contractual or regulatory obligations which prevent them from using Chinese hardware or services, even before the AI boom. That's a huge market. Nvidia will do just fine. (Disclaimer: not a shareholder. At least, not directly.)
> Most US companies that have anything to do with government, finance, medical, etc... That's a huge market. Compared to the rest of the world?
bigger than RotW
Re: GLM-5.3-Flash
#497Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are still industry leaders. They'll have to try to maintain that.
They have like a 3 month lead, and it takes unbelievable expenditure to maintain it.
Not really, not leading at any criteria, altho top 5 in most - https://arena.ai/leaderboard
Re: GLM-5.3-Flash
#498Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ha - I saw this, but took one look at the slopfest README and it sorta scared me away. Will give it a go thanks.
i tought we can just use AI to read the readme and figure it out? install things.. i always do this
We can, but a README like this is usually a very good heuristic that I don't want to install the thing.
Re: GLM-5.3-Flash
#499Google was so ahead when it made this statement: "We Have No Moat And neither does OpenAI" - May 04 2023
https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/google-we-have-no-moat...
Correction: Not a statement, rather, an internal memo by a Google employee. Thanks @granzymes for highlighting.
Re: GLM-5.3-Flash
#500Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's horrible... For the record, I just made a second account, got verified by Persona and still didn't get into TAC. No "we are unable to verify identities in this country" message. No mention of my country whatsoever. Persona verification was successful. What else do they want from us? Were it not for Z.ai's obnoxious terms, I would have switched to them already...
Ah yeah, new accounts get instantly blocked on TAC. Their backend has 2 failure states for `id_verification_status` - `failed` and `blocked`. Nationality bans get `failed`, new accounts (or rather, accounts with not enough good signals) get `blocked` on first attempt.
I see. I'm never going to get into TAC then. OpenAI servers return 403 cyber_verification_precheck_failed. They don't even bother verifying me.
Time to subscribe to Kimi.