[flagged]
Zohran and the Short Link
11–20 of 236 posts
Re: Zohran and the Short Link
#12does it matter? big tech has long canceled url on phones.
I can type a URL on today's iPhone just fine.
Re: Zohran and the Short Link
#13this is how the government should communicate with its people - push out via all social media channels but always link back to something everyone can access! hopefully this stuff gets pushed out via email too? not enough open protocols to receive pushes from otherwise
What if I told you there’s an existing protocol for doing Really Simple Syndication?
Sorry, we're on the wrong timeline. The worse one, in fact.
Re: Zohran and the Short Link
#14[flagged]
Re: Zohran and the Short Link
#15[flagged]
It's ok to keep our personal problems to ourselves.
Re: Zohran and the Short Link
#16[flagged]
What specific policies do you disagree with out of curiosity
Re: Zohran and the Short Link
#17[flagged]
Works on my machine. Didn't see any grammar errors.
Re: Zohran and the Short Link
#18[flagged]
At this point I care more about decency than politics.
Re: Zohran and the Short Link
#19I like click to cancel. Should have a year at least in url
Re: Zohran and the Short Link
#20The problem with these short pithy urls is that their lifetime is limited - there's only so many initiative names and they're going to collide and be removed and replaced. Cool uris don't change[1]. Short, readable uris are great but they should be merely redirecs, and the mapping should be version controlled and exposed to the public as an immutable history. [1] https://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/URI
Luckily these are merely redirects!