Live data from Hacker News

U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

wsj.com

271–280 of 978 posts

Re: U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Didn't we used to fast track citizenship for immigrants who married a US citizen? I mean, the default should be that after the wedding you're now on track to be a citizen within a year or two if the marriage is still in effect by then.

3 years instead of 5 for other LPRs

Re: U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

#272
post #66
post #15

So for those that don't know, it's quite common for a visa renewal to be required to leave the country. Depending on the visa, you might have to do this every year. So just imagine, having a normal job in the US and you're asked to leave to renew your visa and this stuff happens. That's no more appointment, not even a new date and you're now very likely unable to work and possibly can't even enter the country to get…

Inhumane maybe, but our government should owe its first allegiance to our citizens wellbeing, not imported workers.

The mere suggestion that this admin is doing this or anything else for the wellbeing of its citizens is a complete departure from reality.

It's very clear what the motivations are, and just because they don't seem harmful in isolation doesn't mean it's going to have no consequences for everyone else.

Re: U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think part of the problem is that most Americans have no clue how the immigration system works. They see a large number of immigrants and hear horror stories about "chaos at the border" and "open border" and assume it's easy to immigrate. Even if you know someone who immigrated, you probably only know that route. Even though I'm a nationalized citizen myself, I can only tell you about the exact route that applied t…

My wife is an immigrant and there were so many times when I’d talk about something related to her not being a citizen and the other person would say, but you’re married, doesn’t she get citizenship from that? They just thought it was automatic. People have no clue.

Yes, agreed. I came on a fiance visa, then work authorization, then green card, then naturalization. Spouse (the OG US citizen) thought we just needed to get married in the US..

Re: U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

#274
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Inhumane maybe, but our government should owe its first allegiance to our citizens wellbeing, not imported workers.

Surely you would admit that this Administration’s approach to immigration has been both chaotic and cruel. The workers who were given status in the United States expected a predictable process, not one that changes weekly based on the unserious personal whims of a bored, ill-informed and vindictive man. In any case, the prioritization of citizens’ wellbeing writ large is demonstrably _not_ a feature of this Administr…

[flagged]

Re: U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

#275
post #191

"We're not anti-immigration, we're only anti-illegal immigration!" * indefinitely pauses legal immigration *

Slanted take here, but this is exactly what they are doing with the federal government. They like to complain that "big government inefficient and bad" while actively making it inefficient and bad. They are fulfilling their own prophecies. Similar to immigration I'm sure. If all immigration is illegal then it's all bad!

It’s not slanted, it’s accurate.

Re: U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

#276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

The details of this story have glaring mistakes and don't make sense. I know this because I'm a naturalized citizen to the US and I came in on H1B. > He's been doing the paperwork to finally become a citizen, and as one of the final steps he was required to leave the country You don't have to leave the country to become a citizen. I recently became a US citizen a few years back and leaving the country is not required…

True, it does smell a bit fishy..

Re: U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

#277
post #101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think many (if not most) countries in the developed world should reduce immigration, and usa in particular should abolish birthright citizenship. The first because a lower supply of labor is going to create breathing space for an entire working population who will see tremendous job upheaval due to AI automation. A lower aggregate demand on houses, services will also be welcome to take the fuel out of inflation, an…

The administration has never justified immigration policy on economic terms, only keeping out criminals. If it were really part of a coherent anti-inflation, pro-housing strategy, then, well, a lot of other policies would be different... (Including signing the ROAD act, not starting trade wars, or driving up the price of oil)

FWIW the Road ACT became law anyway without his signature, but yeah if he wanted to demonstrate he cared about such things he would have signed it promptly and proudly.

Re: U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

#279
post #17
post #15

So for those that don't know, it's quite common for a visa renewal to be required to leave the country. Depending on the visa, you might have to do this every year. So just imagine, having a normal job in the US and you're asked to leave to renew your visa and this stuff happens. That's no more appointment, not even a new date and you're now very likely unable to work and possibly can't even enter the country to get…

In Canada I had to leave and re-enter for my permanent resident status to complete. It’s not that uncommon - but it’s a pain.

"Flagpoling" was the beautiful euphemism for this.

Re: U.S. State Department pauses immigrant visa applications

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm relieved that the magic soil in the United States can improve these peoples' lives.

It’s a symbiotic relationship. The reason the US is so prosperous is due to immigration, mostly during the 20th century. The US cannot run off of just the existing citizens. Well, it can, for a while, but not indefinitely.

Can't? Do citizens expire? Are you unaware of the concept of children?
Post reply on HN