Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

reuters.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

461–470 of 503 posts

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#461

Post by jdm2212 »

slibhb wrote: post #391
CJefferson wrote: post #364

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is completely different to my experience and my reading of the research. Please link me to any of this research you are talking about.

Meta-analysis, very large, shows small correlation between unhappiness and social media use: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/... Large AU observational study. Moderate social media use correlates to the happiest kids, high use and no use correlates to unhappiness: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abst... Swedish obervational study, after adjusting the data there was…

This is a pretty unimpeachable causal identification strategy finding Facebook's rollout caused worse mental health issues https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.20211218

It's hard to do similarly high quality studies today because no one rolls social media out gradually anymore.

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#462

Post by jrflowers »

slibhb wrote: post #391
CJefferson wrote: post #364

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is completely different to my experience and my reading of the research. Please link me to any of this research you are talking about.

Meta-analysis, very large, shows small correlation between unhappiness and social media use: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/... Large AU observational study. Moderate social media use correlates to the happiest kids, high use and no use correlates to unhappiness: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abst... Swedish obervational study, after adjusting the data there was…

“There are studies that do not line up with my opinion but they aren’t as good as the studies that do” lol

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#463

Post by episky1234 »

cuu508 wrote: post #389
alastairr wrote: post #335

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You describe the apps as though they are recreational drugs with no other purpose but to produce endorphins. These 'apps' have a high level of utility - which is, I imagine, why most start to use them in the first place.

The utility is not of existential importance. Yes, you can uninstall Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, and the sky will not fall, life will just go on.

My neighbors and school parents all coordinate via WhatsApp. The sky will not fall no, but if you don't join those groups you wouldn't know about upcoming HOA meetings, school events, important forms to fill etc.

Facebook is useful for bigger communities like moms groups. We found babysitters that way.

One of my social clubs tried to skip out of social media and was originally meeting in person, calling each other etc, but information just fell through the cracks as the club got larger.

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#464

Post by nobody9999 »

hoppp wrote: post #426
HPMOR wrote: post #411

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I actually do not know if this is true.

Vaping is not healthy but there is a lot less material inhaled. No fine particles which do real damage. So vaping is still unhealthy but less than smoking plant matters.

>Vaping is not healthy but there is a lot less material inhaled. No fine particles which do real damage.

Propylene glycol covers the alvoelae and over time (~15-20 years) blocks uptake of oxygen, causing respiratory failure and a slow, painful death.

Vegetable glycerine coats the lungs and over time (~10-25 years) blocks fluid from draining out of the lungs, causing congestive heart failure/pulmonary edema. Which ends up causing one to drown in their own bodily fluids and a slow, painful death.

If you disagree, please cite any long term studies that disprove the above. Thanks!

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#465

Post by slopinthebag »

freejazz wrote: post #459
slopinthebag wrote: post #457

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

>Your comment history suggests you should heed your own advice about engaging with others in better faith. Why? Again, I'm not complaining. >Fwiw the other person deliberately ignored the obvious point of my comment so blatantly that my response was about as nice as it deserved. You were already being painfully obtuse

[flagged]

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#466

Post by dlandis »

temporallobe wrote: post #374
bsimpson wrote: post #260

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have they? I know a lot of my peers went to college for free with the Millennium Scholarship. But so many young people vape now that it's becoming cool to smoke analog cigarettes. I barely knew anyone who smoked 10-20y ago. Many people that age now do.

Analog cigarettes! I love how “analog” has become synonymous with everything more manual, natural, even or better.

Alternative Meanings (Noun)Comparable Thing: Something similar or comparable to another thing (also spelled analogue).

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#467

Post by vrganj »

nyxtom wrote: post #441
vrganj wrote: post #420

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know this is not a popular viewpoint around here, but as a socialist, let me ask you this question: have we considered that the market itself might be the problem? That maybe the incentives it creates are toxic for humanity?

As a moderate, I tend to think things even out eventually - though it is usually what appears to be generational shifts in behavior that causes markets to adapt. It's costly (whole generations get f'd physically/mentally/financially), but the next generation (maybe?) pushes for something different idk

I appreciate the perspective and I can see the logic, thank you for explaining your position.

That being said, the timescale of change in that proposed mechanism seems too slow to me given the extreme urgency I see in the climate crisis. Do you see a way out of it without systemic change? Do you not share the same assessment of urgency?

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#468

Post by HWR_14 »

hoppp wrote: post #421
_ink_ wrote: post #9

Pay 25% from your 2025 profit for harming children since at least 2019 and be able to continue doing so. Sounds like a loss for society and a win for Meta.

Yeah, they should at least pay it to the children. For rich people, fines are just the price of doing things

The children are free to file their own lawsuit to get money.
Post reply on HN