Live data from Hacker News

GLM-5.3-Flash

z.ai

381–390 of 605 posts

Re: GLM-5.3-Flash

#381

I'm starting to think that this whole sanctioning China may motivate and prompt them to do more and better in every field. It's too big, bright and resourceful of a country to choose confrontation instead of collaboration.

> It's too big, bright and resourceful of a country to choose confrontation instead of collaboration.

It's not like we didn't try it. China first have to learn to make deals where both party benefits.

Re: GLM-5.3-Flash

#382
post #371

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ox Alpha is a smaller model and it was running very slowly. Chinese AI accelerators are coming along, but nVidia’s lead is huge.

Lead doesn't really matter anymore. I just ported a very old cuda library to rocm, so it can be run on MI300s. 2 years ago this would have been a nightmare. Today it was an afternoon.

Exactly. Coding for inference is solved. CUDA is no longer a moat.

Re: GLM-5.3-Flash

#383
post #102

Is the actual Z.AI ecosystem good enough to replace the main drivers like Codex and Claude? Because it looks like Z Code is just a Codex fork. Just like the Kimi Code one is. What irks me about this is that the harnesses seem to be just an afterthought here. Don't get me wrong, I love messing around with installing Pi, getting it hooked up with OpenRouter, and just trying all kinds of different stuff, local models, e…

I think my inexperience using Claude Code or Codex makes a difference but what would you expect to be different here as opposed to using pi or opencode? Pi is my main driver so switching between all these models is a no brainer. No matter what the model is, my harness stays the same: same workflow, same skills, etc.

Re: GLM-5.3-Flash

#385
post #279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lately I've been throwing tasks at Qwen and a frontier or recently-frontier model (as well as Kimi, GLM, etc) and the smaller parameter models are not really comparable to Opus when it comes to making intelligent decisions about greyer areas of good software architecture. Amazing results for open weight and that size, but a really long way off, and I'm extremely skeptical of benchmarks that show these smaller models…

I’ve been doing the same thing, giving the same tasks to Qwen 3.8 27B and Opus, and the main difference is that Qwen does not consider edge cases which Opus catches. It’s good at the happy path, but even when hinting that there are uncovered edge cases and gotchas it’s oblivious to it. So I feel like I need a bigger model to do planning/review.

To be honest I’ll ask a model to specifically think of edge cases but I won’t expect any model to do the edge cases of its own volition

Re: GLM-5.3-Flash

#386
post #187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All the American companies you mentioned still follow American law and regulation. Skirting that blatantly has big consequences. Chinese companies do not follow American laws and there are absolutely no consequences for violating it. Moreover, the average American is not even aware of exactly what the legal/judicial environment is like in China. If your code and data is stolen, you can't fly to China and demand justi…

Aren’t those American companies sued because they didn’t follow American law?

OpenAI is being sued by Apple, yes

Re: GLM-5.3-Flash

#387

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you used the bare API pricing, 1M tokens @ 30% input/70% output/50% cached, you'd pay $0.05805. Even with four discounted sparks, how much are you paying for the same tokens/distribution?

If your usage wouldn't change with local inference and you don't have security/privacy concerns then at the currently heavily subsidized pricing, sure.. not economical. But things change real fast when you're no longer bound by costs/apis/rate limits. All of a sudden it's not about "how can I do this right and efficiently" and more about "I can poke at and test _all the things_ that might make this better". I think m…

And here I am, feeling a bit guilty for using between 2 and 5M tokens... since 1 August!

Employer just sent an email that.. things are changing when it comes to token spend...

What did I do with these?

Setup record/replay for our product using qemu, several variatons thereof including experiments on target hardware. Fixed a tricky bug in qemu that I sadly can't upstream..

Experimented with rr on WSL2 and our target arch. Failed experiment.

Setup mutation testing PoC.

Optimized pipelines

etc. etc. Just contung code its soo much more than I would normally produce, but its also 95% experiments that are still not productized, and much of it never will be.

Re: GLM-5.3-Flash

#389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see a situation where subscription payers move outside American LLMs (chatgpt, claude, gemini) And I don't see a situation where serious API payers are OK with handing the Chinese state all their data. Like manufactures of decades past did and learned a hard, even existential, lesson for it. The state mantra has been "Collect and Copy" for a long time now, tech just hasn't had that moment to experience it yet…

Casual consumers are using American models because their usage is low. As usage scales, the economics heavily favor open weight models. The API pricing from American companies is absurd. This is particularly true in an enterprise setting.

Open weight model hosts don't have the compute to meet enterprise demand. A large part of why these models are so cheap is because overall demand for them is incredibly low. Back in May, Gemini alone was doing about a month's worth of Openrouter tokens every day.

Re: GLM-5.3-Flash

#390
post #309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess like the M3 Ultra, at some point normal customers won’t be able to buy it.

That M3 had an older type of RAM. Apple hopefully secured sufficient supply of the newer variant for the M5 Ultra.

Both use LPDDR5x, they're not shipping LPDDR6 (yet).
Post reply on HN