Live data from Hacker News

Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

reuters.com

431–440 of 501 posts

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#431
post #389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The utility is not of existential importance. Yes, you can uninstall Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, and the sky will not fall, life will just go on.

Similarly to how you can just eat less and lose weight.

You're making an argument about self-control in a conversation that is explicitly about factors other than self-control.

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#432
post #389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You describe the apps as though they are recreational drugs with no other purpose but to produce endorphins. These 'apps' have a high level of utility - which is, I imagine, why most start to use them in the first place.

The utility is not of existential importance. Yes, you can uninstall Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, and the sky will not fall, life will just go on.

[deleted]

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#433
post #419

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you're on Android, install F-Droid and get one of the apps there that let you watch Youtube. No ads[1] and you can disable shorts. [1] I'm not fundamentally against ads, but the Youtube ad situation has gotten ridiculous. They're far worse than cable TV ads.

For just the ads, there's also YouTube premium.

If I pay for a streaming service, I'll compare it with other paid streaming services.

Youtube is, for me, the worst streaming experience - by a significant margin. Terrible curation. Terrible recommendations. Terrible UI. No way would I pay for it.

(Oh, and if I paid, can I get it not to show me any Shorts?)

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#434

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You know what point I was making Try being as generous as you demand of others

Perhaps you should look in the mirror, friend.

Why? I'm not the one complaining about being "misunderstood" while doing the same exact thing to others.

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#435
post #9

Pay 25% from your 2025 profit for harming children since at least 2019 and be able to continue doing so. Sounds like a loss for society and a win for Meta.

May depend on whether their profits come from less than or more than 25% of 'children-harming'.

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#438

>Meta will impose daily usage limits and restrict nighttime usage by children who use Facebook and Instagram, and enhance measures to prevent children from accessing age-restricted content So meta won. The only thing I'm asking for is better control over my social media. Let me remove infinite scroll on Instagram and don't show me things I have explicitly followed on Facebook. And do this setting by default and a cig…

"I know you can do this with custom apps and I'm doing that but you have no clue how many non tech people beg me to share how"

Wait...I'm in tech and I'm begging you to share how. Is there a way on iOS?

I've mostly just stopped using these apps.

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#439
post #389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You describe the apps as though they are recreational drugs with no other purpose but to produce endorphins. These 'apps' have a high level of utility - which is, I imagine, why most start to use them in the first place.

The utility is not of existential importance. Yes, you can uninstall Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, and the sky will not fall, life will just go on.

Strange argument, you could say the same for almost anything.

Re: Meta reaches $17B settlement over social media harms to children

#440
post #389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The utility is not of existential importance. Yes, you can uninstall Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, and the sky will not fall, life will just go on.

Similarly to how you can just eat less and lose weight.

> The utility is not of existential importance. Yes, you can uninstall Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, and the sky will not fall, life will just go on.

>> Similarly to how you can just eat less and lose weight.

I'd argue it isn't similar in an important way, people cannot opt out of eating entirely. Overeaters must eat. People who can't control themselves with social media do not need to use them at all.

Post reply on HN