Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Are you still using AI code autocomplete?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 22 posts

Re: Ask HN: Are you still using AI code autocomplete?

#12
I liked Cursor autocomplete a lot, it was very smart and adapted very well to your intentions, then, and they never will tell you, when they launched coding agents the autocomplete feature was somehow tuned down, not by being dumber but by being too proactive, so it resulted useless most of the time

Re: Ask HN: Are you still using AI code autocomplete?

#14

I don't find myself needing to open a code editor anymore. I ask agents to code and review using some custom review tooling I had agents build. I bother less and less about code details.

That’s the way to do it! Build tooling around your agents to streamline workflows and increase your confidence in them. The agent knows when to reach out for guidance, besides that it runs on its own.

Re: Ask HN: Are you still using AI code autocomplete?

#20
post #10
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I get what you mean. I don't think autocomplete has changed radically either, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. What autocomplete/editor were you using when you felt the productivity gain was mostly a placebo? I've mostly used it in VS Code and a bit in Antigravity.

I predominantly used GitHub's product (it had integrations for VS, VS code, jetbrains), and Supermaven. Later, I tried one of the earlier Cursor versions as well.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN