Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: How much of Hacker News is about AI?

hnstats.com

21–30 of 49 posts

Re: Show HN: How much of Hacker News is about AI?

#21
post #6

you could fetch the text from linked blog posts over time and run 'em through pangram, I bet >20% of blogs linked on HN today are totally LLM written

An estimated 2,000 articles per month at 2,000 words per article would result in 4,000,000 words, which costs either $200 or $2000 to process at Pangram [1]. It might make life a lot more enjoyable for many users here, though.

[1] https://www.pangram.com/pricing?category=developers

Re: Show HN: How much of Hacker News is about AI?

#24

At first I thought about how many posts were written by AI

Multiple times authors have been asked about AI usage on HN, because readers (rightfully) suspected it was AI written. I don't have a problem with AI written articles, or assisted.

But then the authors lie or make ludicrous excuses for why their article "sounds" like AI. Then I check with Pangram and yep. It is completely AI written.

You get a few free checks on Pangram each day or so. Just start checking and encourage people to be honest.

AI has its place. Lying about it and misrepresenting it makes everyone dislike AI more, even as they use it themselves.

Re: Show HN: How much of Hacker News is about AI?

#25
I expected this to call out the number of links that are obviously vibe coded, like itself!

If you see:

- ALL CAPS subheaders

- a light beige background

- burnt sienna anchor and/or highlight text

- a "• LIVE" (or really any pulsing • symbol with an ALL CAPS follow-up)

- tons of variation in font sizes (this one has 15 different text sizes!)

- more typically, a lot of overexplaining

...you know it's vibe'd, specifically with Claude!

Re: Show HN: How much of Hacker News is about AI?

#27

At first I thought about how many posts were written by AI

Multiple times authors have been asked about AI usage on HN, because readers (rightfully) suspected it was AI written. I don't have a problem with AI written articles, or assisted. But then the authors lie or make ludicrous excuses for why their article "sounds" like AI. Then I check with Pangram and yep. It is completely AI written. You get a few free checks on Pangram each day or so. Just start checking and encoura…

> Then I check with Pangram and yep. It is completely AI written.

“AI detectors” do NOT work reliably.

Even humans who are ever-so-certain about being able to identify AI usage constantly embarrass themselves when that claimed ability is put to the test. Look up “AI Monet Instagram” for a social experiment where hundreds of cocksure users pointed out “AI signs” in what was claimed to be an AI-generated painting in the style of Monet, but was actually a genuine Monet.

Post reply on HN