Live data from Hacker News

Nebula Sans

nebulasans.com

11–20 of 203 posts

Re: Nebula Sans

#12
post #2

A handsome font and a worthwhile contribution. Satisfying. Nebula notches yet another mark.

..downvoted. OK. Perhaps I didn't say enough:

- I love the use of Source Sans as the base. One of the few purely good things Adobe has done in the past decade were the Source fonts

- The use of Whitney as a target font is also interesting. I like this font a lot but a lot of nice fonts have annoying properties for web dev (looking at you Frutiger) esp around numbers. I have wasted life years fiddling with tabular number presentation.

There, is that enough red meat for you, HN? :)

Re: Nebula Sans

#15
> A versatile, modern, humanist sans-serif with a neutral aesthetic

Good God I am sick to the back teeth of the neutral aesthetic. If you're going to spend all that money, can we have some _opinionated_ typefaces please? Especially against the backdrop of AI making everything look and feel exactly the same everywhere, the last thing anybody needs is another neutral, characterless, soulless typeface.

Re: Nebula Sans

#16

The differences are really, really subtle, I'd bet most people (including me) would have a really hard time telling them apart. I agree with that one person (I can't recall when or where I read this) who said modern typography is getting so frivolous about doing personalised typographic families for startups instead of extending the existing ones to cover more languages and scripts than latin. But as they say here, "…

“For the money, dances the dog” —Yoda

Re: Nebula Sans

#19
post #6

Waste of time and money on their part. There are more than enough typefaces in this world that look just like this one.

According to their website this saved them a lot of money, plus they also made a documentary about making the font which is content for Nebula.
Post reply on HN