Live data from Hacker News

Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

github.com

721–730 of 1001 posts

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#722

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's less that "this place" loves X, more that there is a committed segment of folks with flagging privileges that really really like a certain South African business guy.

More accurately, there are people here who don't hate the guy with a burning passion, and find the rhetoric of those who do really, really obnoxious. Especially the persecution complex and the dark hinting.

[flagged]

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#723

Once upon a time I used Twitter's API to scan for tweets that were talking about a particular Wikipedia page. Doing semantic analysis, I did insert the tweets in the right place of the page. I did it as a student, using the free API. Twitter was the open, technically respected network with a great engineering blog. Now it's a political project to elect the extreme-right in Europe.

Just Europe?

At the moment.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#724

who cares about c&d? just host it outside of us

An anonymous group of devs should host the source on Radicle (over Tor) and the app itself on an onion site. Bonus, it may discourage some scrapers who can’t be bothered with setting up a Tor gateway.

[dead]

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#725
post #602

I really don't think this is going to have the effect that X thinks it will have. I've always said that if XCancel and Nitter get taken down, I'm not going to suddenly decide to make an X account--I'm just going to stop reading their content. Same for old.reddit.com. If they kill it, I'm not going to give in and create an account--I'm just going to stop visiting.

But a few other people will make an account to continue reading

Still a major net loss in "eyeballs".

If I was an advertiser on twitter I would be out of there too unless they proactively lowered ad fees real quick.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#726
That's how each of your cat-and-mouse games end, right?

I mean, even the name already is the perfect symbol of what goes wrong in people's brains, right?

Xcancel should be about cancelling X. Not about adding another pipe to it. ;)

But yeah, people will never become smarter, I guess... Jusz their glasses do.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#727

Why have we let X (et al) have total control over the content posted by the users ? Why do the users agree to the limits imposed by them and let the platform decide who gets to see the content they posted ? Because they're offering the infrastructure. The tech for such a network is now within reach of many, but these apps are heavily dominated by network effects and that makes it impossible for competing apps to take…

Because open protocols were abandoned, because they generally lacked security, discoverability, and perhaps most significantly of all, moderation. Even FINGER had .plan files, where you could get status updates from people. But how are you going to query whose plans you want to read, and who is going to moderate without centralisation? It's the moderation in particular that dooms most federalised efforts. The web its…

The requirement for strong moderation only exists *because* of centralization. If I'm looking at a linear feed of content, it has to be curated by someone. In the old days, content on the internet was mostly links between webpages -- the "web" if you will. If i like the content on a page, it'll link to other pages i may like, and I'm free to follow those links at will, and no third party moderation is required.

Contrast with modern social media, where everything is condensed into a single list of algorithmically curated content, and we've implicitly eroded a lot of freedom (and handed control to Big Tech)

All this to say: bring back webrings.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#728
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven't left because there are still circles of people I follow that haven't bailed. Once a large enough majority move to Bluesky, I'll start browsing that app more. On the other hand, I might start posting on Bluesky more because as of a week ago, I'm shadowbanned on X. I know people throw that term around, but nobody on the site can see any of my reply tweets, even me (unless I scroll my account's 'replies' tab);…

> Once a large enough majority move to Bluesky, I'll start browsing that app more The problem is a network effect. Lot of people rage quit X and then they return to it because they realize the reach isn't there on Bluesky, and whenever that happens it just sends strong signals I don't really like X either, I feel like the feed algorithm isn't very good and just shows the same thing repeated by multiple accounts. I'm…

What's funny is that people who use social media to drive traffic seem to consistently say they get more real click throughs to their content from bsky than twitter, despite having a fraction of the follower counts and post engagement that they have on twitter (even before all the barriers Musk enacted to keep users on twitter).

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#730
post #574
post #343

https://joinmastodon.org/ https://bsky.app/ https://www.threads.com/ Pick literally any one of those, just seriously, if you're still on that platform, leave.

Don't just throw some competitor URLs and tell us to "leave." What's wrong with X? How are these options better?

You mean besides it being a factory for child pornography?
Post reply on HN