Live data from Hacker News

U.S. gov't moves to suppress pushback on data centers

tomshardware.com

1–10 of 137 posts

Re: U.S. gov't moves to suppress pushback on data centers

#2
> The latest proposal applies to permits for a "minor source" of air pollution ... [the Vantage data center was estimated to contribute] between $53 million and $99 million in annual health damages, the largest estimate for any single facility ever.

'The largest estimate for any single facility ever.'

'Minor source.'

I give you double-speak, gentlefolks of HN. Name it something - anything - and you frame it in those terms forever. It will take significant work to not refer to these as 'minor sources' when debating if they are a minor source.

Re: U.S. gov't moves to suppress pushback on data centers

#5
It’s funny as Greg Abbott says the data center industry did this to themselves and people’s complaints are justified; the feds say it’s “paid protestors”, the same way they say any protests are inorganic paid leftist agitators. Meanwhile “real” American patriots know data centers make America great, and can’t wait to have one built down the road.

Re: U.S. gov't moves to suppress pushback on data centers

#6

> The latest proposal applies to permits for a "minor source" of air pollution ... [the Vantage data center was estimated to contribute] between $53 million and $99 million in annual health damages, the largest estimate for any single facility ever. 'The largest estimate for any single facility ever.' 'Minor source.' I give you double-speak, gentlefolks of HN. Name it something - anything - and you frame it in those…

https://www.pecva.org/wp-content/uploads/Health-Impacts-Vant... the report

> Based on Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VA DEQ) air permit No. 74242, the facility is authorized to operate eight natural-gas simple-cycle turbines and more than fifty diesel generators, including emergency and black-start units

Re: U.S. gov't moves to suppress pushback on data centers

#7
There isn’t much the federal government can do here. Planning permission is very local in the US. If local officials don’t want a data center it isn’t happening.

In most communities these days you’d have better luck proposing to build a toxic waste processing facility than a data center.

Re: U.S. gov't moves to suppress pushback on data centers

#8

> The latest proposal applies to permits for a "minor source" of air pollution ... [the Vantage data center was estimated to contribute] between $53 million and $99 million in annual health damages, the largest estimate for any single facility ever. 'The largest estimate for any single facility ever.' 'Minor source.' I give you double-speak, gentlefolks of HN. Name it something - anything - and you frame it in those…

https://www.pecva.org/wp-content/uploads/Health-Impacts-Vant... the report > Based on Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VA DEQ) air permit No. 74242, the facility is authorized to operate eight natural-gas simple-cycle turbines and more than fifty diesel generators, including emergency and black-start units

So it is a low efficiency power station with some servers attached to it.

Re: U.S. gov't moves to suppress pushback on data centers

#9

This degrowth anti-technology mindset just does not make sense to me, and I think it's mostly astroturfed from TikTok.

What part confuses you? The threat to stable and affordable electricity and water supply? The water, light and noise pollution? The threat to jobs? The threat to truth and transparency? The threat to privacy?
Post reply on HN