Live data from Hacker News

New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

apple.com

281–290 of 349 posts

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#281
post #271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like we are basically reliving the COVID era supply chain crunch, that it's basically inevitable that in 18-36 months more capacity will come online and prices will crash back to earth. Whether OEMs like Apple pass these savings along to consumers is tbd though.

Memory orders for the whole 2027 were already reserved. There is little indication that in 2028 situation will be any better unless something drastic happens like AI crash. And then the opposite can happen like an unknown drone with 100 kg warhead striking memory production facility.

Yeah… “unknown”. As if we don’t know any countries seeking to end democracy in Taiwan…

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#282
post #17
post #2

It's a bit of an emotional goodbye to the super cheap Mac Minis we got to enjoy for a while. I got some for family members, we had some serving as iOS/macOS build servers sitting in a closet at my last job, they were fantastic. Not that they're a bad deal now, but at European prices of over €1000 for M6/16GB/256GB it's a psychological barrier that's been broken.

If you adjust for inflation, is it a big change from the super cheap Mac Minis of the past? Probably still somewhat more expensive, but not as much as the nominal difference would imply.

[deleted]

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#283
post #129
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cool, like a $5 VPS?

A $5 VPS is easy to block. It's way harder to block a stock mac mini from a residential IP address

Tailscale the vps into your home network, and have it use that as an exit node.

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#284

One of the things that Steve Jobs got very right was "and you can order right now". Announcements where you have to wait a month to order throw away all of the hype. Even allowing pre-orders and shipping later is a better idea and so silly that Apple has started walking away from that.

So many things I would impulse buy, but I have to wait a month and so I don't.

Don't give them ideas...

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#285

So happy with my base M4 purchase for $499 when it released. I even snagged a 1TB replacement drive for $199 a year ago. Feels like I got the last train out.

I know it's at least a little irrational, but I am indescribably angry with the pricing trajectory of personal computing. I'm not all that young and for pretty much all my life the computers you as a random person could buy have consistently become massively more performant and massively cheaper over time. Even when the exponential performance increases started to taper off, every few years you could buy or build a n…

“It costs a lot to buy a new computer better than the one I have” is another way of saying “computers aren’t going obsolete as fast” which sounds like a great thing.

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#286
post #223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, the "neural accelerators" in the M5 GPU cores really do 4x pre-fill performance over M4. You can find benchmarks online since M5 has been out for months now. I assume the M6 has whatever the next-gen version of those is. These are not the "neural processors" that have been there since M1 (those still exist) but are additionl matrix math accelerators inside the actual GPU cores. Like "tensor cores" on Nvidia GPUs…

Thank you, found some benchmarks and they look really promising. To my understanding those Neural Accelerators are like AMX but for GPUs. With those accelerators the GPU performance on a M5 Max in LLM inferencing would totally be on par with a 5090, that's quite impressive!

Which inference benchmark are you looking at? The prefill speeds should be comparable on some LLMs, but the 5090 has much a higher theoretical max decode speed.

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#287
post #258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know it's at least a little irrational, but I am indescribably angry with the pricing trajectory of personal computing. I'm not all that young and for pretty much all my life the computers you as a random person could buy have consistently become massively more performant and massively cheaper over time. Even when the exponential performance increases started to taper off, every few years you could buy or build a n…

Isn’t this just inflation? We are in a highly inflationary environment. Everything is going up in nominal terms.

DOES 400% SOUND NOMINAL TO YOU?

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#288
post #261

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am shocked every time I see one of those driving in SF. street parking must be awful!

I drove one as a loaner. It is big. No dashboard. square steering wheel without turn signals or gear stalk. The rear-view mirror doesn't see out unless you lower the cover in the back. The side mirrors are strangely shaped and small. The front corners are a mysterious mostly unpredictable distance out the front window. But then... It has cameras in all directions including the front bumper. There is a top-down sort o…

an enema is also an interesting experience.

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#289

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know it's at least a little irrational, but I am indescribably angry with the pricing trajectory of personal computing. I'm not all that young and for pretty much all my life the computers you as a random person could buy have consistently become massively more performant and massively cheaper over time. Even when the exponential performance increases started to taper off, every few years you could buy or build a n…

“It costs a lot to buy a new computer better than the one I have” is another way of saying “computers aren’t going obsolete as fast” which sounds like a great thing.

It also costs more to buy the same computer you already have, which is not a great thing.

Re: New Mac mini, featuring M6 and M5 Pro

#290
post #51

After watching a video about how the filesystems are > 2x faster (and testing this myself in my mac mini vs a linux machine), I feel like Apple is leaving a lot on the table, and I hope that they get APFS to be as fast as the linux filesystems. Because otherwise a lot of this hardware (including their blazing fast SSDs) is wasted. Cuz my M1 mac mini is awesome otherwise.

It might not be the fastest, but at least it supports setting/keeping file creation time - unlike the clusterf*ck we still have on basically all Linux filesystems unfortunately

You're blaming the wrong thing.

It's the Linux kernel that deliberately does not provide user land a way to change file creation times.

Meanwhile XNU/macOS does.

Post reply on HN