Live data from Hacker News

Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

github.com

501–510 of 1001 posts

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#501
post #257

The only reason why I needed nitter to access x is due to organizations still using it as their main communication solution to their customers. Even my local council uses it. I would like this to be the final push for people to get off x but I suspect its going g to stay and I guess I don't get to see news from my local council anymore.

The main competitor in this space is sadly Instagram, which is no better.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#502
post #306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When fighting Nazis, it's quite valuable to be able to hear what they're saying and know where they're going.

Sounds like you are their biggest fans to care so much?

Wow, uh, not the level of discourse I expect out of HN.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#503

I really don't think this is going to have the effect that X thinks it will have. I've always said that if XCancel and Nitter get taken down, I'm not going to suddenly decide to make an X account--I'm just going to stop reading their content. Same for old.reddit.com. If they kill it, I'm not going to give in and create an account--I'm just going to stop visiting.

I started using Reddit after the Digg 4 fiasco. I mostly lurk. I like things like the localllama subreddit. If I log in to contribute it’s a high effort post with good information.

Reddit can go ahead and extract as much value as possible by turning their site into a slop factory. I won’t be around to see it. I haven’t visited for a week after near daily use for 15 years.

Reddit 4 isn’t for me.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#504

Just so you know – if you are reading this – X is no longer an effective form of publishing as I will not, now or ever, create an account just in order to read something that you have written on there.

X is the perfect named because it describes the core interaction after trying to view something on the site. Lmao.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#505

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It goes against the whole “global town square" declaration. Only if you're part of the club. If not, fuck off! I choose to fuck off.

Want to come to the free town square ? Gotta show ID first to the guard at the wall

& the town square forces you to listen to famous gossippers and dumb popular people you've never heard of

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#506
post #257

The only reason why I needed nitter to access x is due to organizations still using it as their main communication solution to their customers. Even my local council uses it. I would like this to be the final push for people to get off x but I suspect its going g to stay and I guess I don't get to see news from my local council anymore.

I'm totally clueless, but aren't there rules requiring accessibility of public-facing government communications, to the extent that they shouldn't be allowed to use a gated platform when making official statements that are a matter of public interest?

I presume the post is referencing principal councils in England or Wales. They're powerful enough to make life difficult, but small enough to not get a lot of oversight. From what I've heard, it's like a government-backed HOA, and they're notorious for doing whatever they want, while not letting you do what you want.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#507
post #257

The only reason why I needed nitter to access x is due to organizations still using it as their main communication solution to their customers. Even my local council uses it. I would like this to be the final push for people to get off x but I suspect its going g to stay and I guess I don't get to see news from my local council anymore.

You still have access to local council posts, without logging in. You need to log in to view the follow up discussions(comments) a subtle but important distinction

For example you can view the main post and included links in incognito not logged in, just not the "discussion"

https://x.com/ManCityCouncil/status/2091903421917892994?s=20

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#508

Especially rich coming from X Corp, with their xAI-Bot web scrapers.

I didn't get much use out of XCancel, because it usually assumed I was a bot and refused to show me the page.

It's web scrapers with anti-scraping filters, all the way down.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#509
post #243

Move to the fediverse or die. Twitter has been irrelevant for nearly a decade now.

You can’t move to “the fediverse”, only a specific instance.

Email has federated pretty reliably. Granted, it's nearly impossible to host your own server, because the rest will automatically assume you are only sending spam, but the well-known servers all federate quite nicely. Worst case scenario is that some organizations put a footer on outside messages warning that it's not internal.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#510
post #378

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure why Threads makes your cut here, trading one walking negative externality of person in control for another is not really a sell to most folks.

it has Fediverse interop. Skepticism obviously is warranted towards the owners but you can at least interact with an open protocol or consume threads content from a Mastodon instance, say.

And Twitter used to have free API access. And Facebook Messenger used to have Jabber compatibility. I don't think those companies deserve any trust in regards of promoting them for their open initiatives.

Threads' activity pub gimmick is just a nice to have. It's the salad of the Big Mac. If you're going to eat it anyway, sure, glad it is there, but it doesn't make it deserve a spot in any serious discussion about healthy food alternatives.

Post reply on HN