[flagged]
Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
481–490 of 1001 posts
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#482Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it. That's not true for X. You can read content without being signed in. https://help.x.com/en/safety-and-security/public-and-protect...
Not in any useful way that makes Twitter better or different than other sources of news.
But that's beside the point. I was pointing out that X does allow non-logged in users view posts.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#483Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#484A real shame. Even if you put all the political arguments aside it sucks when a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it. For me that’ll mean I just don’t read content on there any more. Which I realise X doesn’t care about, I’m not monetisable anyway. But a shame nonetheless.
> when a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it. Where does this come from? You can see the last few posts of an account [1], and the contents of a single posts, but minimal to no comments [2]. Videos play after dismissing the login popup. I have no X account, but I read content there all the time without issue. [1] https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack [2] https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/209198394060…
On mobile right now, I can't scroll past the second post of [1] without getting blocked by an undismissable popup.
If I click on the "read more" button of the first post, I can't scroll down at all before getting that same non-dismissable popup. It makes it hard to read the post itself, because even scrolling a tiny bit (e.g. to get what I'm reading closer to the center of my vision) triggers it.
I've also had other times where I couldn't play a video someone linked to me, but sometimes I can, don't know why.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#485Earlier quoted context omitted.
Reddit is the worst for this. I hate the disgusting, low class UX design where they let you read about 10-15 seconds of a page before locking you out. Though I think Pinterest takes the cake for being just the ugliest example of this.
Old Reddit is now completely unusable without an account. Maybe it's time for me to finally stop using it.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#486Earlier quoted context omitted.
> when a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it. Where does this come from? You can see the last few posts of an account [1], and the contents of a single posts, but minimal to no comments [2]. Videos play after dismissing the login popup. I have no X account, but I read content there all the time without issue. [1] https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack [2] https://x.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/209198394060…
I received an Amber Alert a few days ago, which linked to a Twitter post containing the details, and the "x" in the "plz login" modal that blocked the entire screen was non-functional. I just sat there pounding on the x, and then a little hand gif popped up and pointed at the login button.
Not the giant X in the middle.
Horrible UI choices.....
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#487Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm totally clueless, but aren't there rules requiring accessibility of public-facing government communications, to the extent that they shouldn't be allowed to use a gated platform when making official statements that are a matter of public interest?
It's not gated. You can read any non-adult post with a direct link. I'm seeing this perspective all over in here. As someone without an X account, I can only assume you all have X accounts to not know this!
If I have a link to a local emergency department twitter handle, I can view all of their recent posts, right?
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#488I really don't think this is going to have the effect that X thinks it will have. I've always said that if XCancel and Nitter get taken down, I'm not going to suddenly decide to make an X account--I'm just going to stop reading their content. Same for old.reddit.com. If they kill it, I'm not going to give in and create an account--I'm just going to stop visiting.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#489A real shame. Even if you put all the political arguments aside it sucks when a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it. For me that’ll mean I just don’t read content on there any more. Which I realise X doesn’t care about, I’m not monetisable anyway. But a shame nonetheless.
> a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it. That's not true for X. You can read content without being signed in. https://help.x.com/en/safety-and-security/public-and-protect...
Edit: also can't read a thread because each new post is considered a "reply", so blocked too.
Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices
#490Earlier quoted context omitted.
Old Reddit is now completely unusable without an account. Maybe it's time for me to finally stop using it.
Do database dumps of it still exist? Maybe it’s time to just download it and Wikipedia, then point an LLM / vectordb at it.
Perhaps the way to solve for X is having a scraper serve the data via torrent and/or IPFS vs centralized systems like nitter and xcancel.