Live data from Hacker News

Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

github.com

311–320 of 1001 posts

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#311

I’ve been writing an HN clone that’s literally a clone. It copies all front page posts and comments. I just wanted to say publicly that dang is awesome. Instead of shutting down the idea, he’s been actively helping the project by answering periodic emails and… well, not shutting it down. Not sure what to do with it yet. Maybe I could let users have custom filtering rules. But the point is, companies should support co…

I don't mean to discourage you, and it's great that you've gotten that support; but I don't understand what purpose this serves. I had understood that Nitter exists exactly because of the forces that would make X leadership tend not to like its existence. HN is already not trying to sell things or make the interface obnoxious for logged-out users, and it makes very responsible use of JavaScript; what is there to filt…

No discouragement taken :) Thanks for the question.

Some people have asked for a "No AI" version of HN. That's one possibility.

Another possibility is to just stop cloning comments, so that only the articles are mirrored, and then launch the site. There would be few comments, but that might be a feature. I sometimes miss when HN was small.

A third is to AI-generate the comments. That way it's like https://reddit.com/r/subsimulatorgpt2.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#315

Move to the fediverse or die. Twitter has been irrelevant for nearly a decade now.

> Twitter has been irrelevant for nearly a decade now.

False.

X was supposed to die by now, its never been more alive.

In fact "Which instance?" is the reason why the fediverse died.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#316
A real shame. Even if you put all the political arguments aside it sucks when a site requires you to log in before you can read content on it.

For me that’ll mean I just don’t read content on there any more. Which I realise X doesn’t care about, I’m not monetisable anyway. But a shame nonetheless.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#319
post #257

The only reason why I needed nitter to access x is due to organizations still using it as their main communication solution to their customers. Even my local council uses it. I would like this to be the final push for people to get off x but I suspect its going g to stay and I guess I don't get to see news from my local council anymore.

I'm totally clueless, but aren't there rules requiring accessibility of public-facing government communications, to the extent that they shouldn't be allowed to use a gated platform when making official statements that are a matter of public interest?

Newspapers are still often required to be used for certain government publications and they cost money. TwitterX is free. I'm not clear what the controversy here is exactly.

Re: Nitter and XCancel receive cease and desist notices

#320
post #296

What's the point of such a service? It sounds like performative nonsense.

You need an account to access X. Change the URL to xcancel and you can view these accounts. It also looks like X requires a Google or Apple account to sign up if you don’t use your phone number. I’m not linking any of that to the X cesspool.

You do not need an account to access specific X posts/tweets. You do need an account to read all replies.
Post reply on HN