What about all the other wearable sensors like https://www.stelo.com https://www.hellolingo.com
No FDA authorization I guess
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-clea...
21–30 of 255 posts
What about all the other wearable sensors like https://www.stelo.com https://www.hellolingo.com
No FDA authorization I guess
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-clea...
What about all the other wearable sensors like https://www.stelo.com https://www.hellolingo.com
So she was merely ahead of her time.
So she was merely ahead of her time.
So she was merely ahead of her time.
What about all the other wearable sensors like https://www.stelo.com https://www.hellolingo.com
This is not verified info, but I would assume these are either A) the exact same device, just with different marketing B) "binned" production runs that did not meet the accuracy threshold for clinical/prescribed use, but are otherwise "good enough" for someone looking to healthmaxx.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
non-invasive continuous blood sugar measurement is mired in patents and technical challenges. Turns out it's really difficult to disambiguate the absorption lines of glucose from other similarly shaped molecules when you're also dealing with untangling skin conductivity, transmissivity, sweat, inflammation etc.
I also think there's no financial incentive from incumbents to develop something like this. Why would abbott develop something that works "forever" if they can milk people buying new sensors every 10~14 days.
Diabetics would snap up a smart watch which does accurate glucose monitoring in a heartbeat.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also think there's no financial incentive from incumbents to develop something like this. Why would abbott develop something that works "forever" if they can milk people buying new sensors every 10~14 days.
For abbott, no. But what about for Garmin, Apple, Samsung, or Google? Diabetics would snap up a smart watch which does accurate glucose monitoring in a heartbeat.