Live data from Hacker News

Was modern art a CIA psy-op? (2020)

daily.jstor.org

21–30 of 264 posts

Re: Was modern art a CIA psy-op? (2020)

#23

“educate, inspire, and strengthen the hearts and wills of free men.” Funny how times have changed and more or less everyone on every side is fighting for the strength and survival of their own groupthink and little more.

Eventually, people realize they will never agree and therefore don't have to fight. They realize the majority of their beliefs already existed before they were born and will continue on after they're dead. They have nothing to add to the conversation while they are too busy fighting. They turn their focus to developing their ideas peacefully and let their subcultures flourish once again. This isn't the first cycle an…

"Live and let live" is in fundamental tension with "protect the weak." ALL aggressive ideologies act as heroes protecting others from oppression. There is a barely expressible thing that allows people to live in peace with those they disagree with. It is a personality trait, an aesthetic, a mood associated with the best of the Enlightenment but never described by it. Perhaps people need relative silence, a few good books, physical labor, hand-made goods, and slow travel to attain it. I often wonder at how boldly people think they can reduce the enormous, holistic experience of being of a particular time and place and call the effect simply "reason".

Re: Was modern art a CIA psy-op? (2020)

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love art. Contemporary art is a bunch of ugly wankery by pretentious people who are bored of actual beauty and can only amuse themselves by creating ugly stuff, then claiming "you just don't get it". The world would be a significantly better place without contemporary art in it.

This could have been written at any point after the 1850s or so.

Indeed. Once galleries became significant buyers of art, scandalous art became an attractive thing to produce: it commanded outsized attention.

The dynamics are similar in Twitter today, too.

Re: Was modern art a CIA psy-op? (2020)

#27
post #18

I don’t know if this is a reaction to AI or something, but recently I’ve only been interested in classical/realism art. I just can’t do abstract cubes anymore. The default wallpaper of windows 11 is a perfect example - I hate it. Give me a wallpaper of some painting from the Renaissance.

I feel like a picture of rolling hills with spring wheat and a blue sky wouldn’t go amiss

Re: Was modern art a CIA psy-op? (2020)

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I like bananas. https://www.npr.org/2024/11/21/nx-s1-5199568/a-duct-taped-ba...

Okay, this is a bit too far xD. But I wouldn’t put this in the same bucket as Pollock. I genuinely find his work interesting.

Modern art is weird.

https://smarthistory.org/andres-serrano-piss-christ/

Re: Was modern art a CIA psy-op? (2020)

#29
post #18

I don’t know if this is a reaction to AI or something, but recently I’ve only been interested in classical/realism art. I just can’t do abstract cubes anymore. The default wallpaper of windows 11 is a perfect example - I hate it. Give me a wallpaper of some painting from the Renaissance.

I feel like a picture of rolling hills with spring wheat and a blue sky wouldn’t go amiss

They should bring it back
Post reply on HN