Live data from Hacker News

Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

larsfaye.com

501–510 of 575 posts

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#501
> The trillion-dollar bet that is being made is: this knowledge won't matter, because LLMs will take up the slack and effectively become the new generation of "developers". It starts give off an aire of hubris that drove past no-code movements, and the fever dreams of CEOs, rather than the reality on the ground.

Yes, this is the bet being made by everyone, together. No, nobody is actually making it.

The cost and benefit of a pipeline to train programmers is an externality. You do not benefit from training programmers as you do not employ them long enough to get a return on that investment. However you will hire some programmer hired by someone else and get the benefit of their investment. It kind of ended up as a wash, and there was enough 'shit shoveling' work to make it economical to keep some junior engineers around to keep senior engineers happy, and some of those junior engineers would learn and grow and end up as the next generation of actually productive engineers.

This entire system has already collapsed. Junior engineers are not low value and thus low wage anymore, they are highly negative in value, as before they would puzzle on something for days and finally come back with a small PR that kind-of worked but needed revision. Now they can puke out 50,000 lines of code that they don't understand in 3 hours. You'll never be able to make them sit and just do stuff by hand, and they can't supervise an AI. Having them around means you'll have to basically ignore them and not look at whatever they are trying to do, and never use any of the code, or else you will waste orders of magnitude more senior engineer time as they are forced to de tangle the mess to even understand what it does. Or you just go with it and in 3 months you have 25 million lines of code and no person or AI can make a change anymore without breaking 15 things.

There is no benefit to any company, at least in countries where you can't lock someone into a very long term contract, in hiring junior engineers anymore, so they will just stop doing this. If they did hire juniors it wouldn't help them, as they will still demand much more pay and leave if you don't give it to them the moment they can pass interviews at a more senior level. So they are just going to stop, the pipeline will dry up, and they'll pay a lot more for senior people as the supply gets more and more scarce. This is self reinforcing, the more you pay them the earlier they will retire.

By the time governments and the industry are feeling enough pain to do something about this salaries will be out of control.

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#502
post #416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

10,000 LOC, hell my LLM can do that in a day! Current project has over 60,000 LOC, I find using an antagonistic agent code and architecture reviews are really handy for keeping things grounded.

How do you know things are grounded?

My tests work, multiple agents confirm the code base. Code reviews pass.

I do very little actual reading of code anymore. Now I am more of a results merchant.

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#503

Yes and that's okay. Very few people know how to read assembly, instruction sets, binary or even transistor combos. All those layers have been "left behind" to become specializations. In many ways coding is always about abstracting and LLMs can be a form of "higher level coding". There's lots of problems with this argument, but it's what's happening and we'll be okay. We've always been.

> All those layers have been "left behind" to become specializations.

This never happened. The people who understood and worked with all of that still exist. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s not more of them now. What happened is more people who didn’t need to know all of that joined the circus.

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#504

I see a large emphasis placed on headless agentic/vibe coding, what I don't see people talking about is how great guided coding is. I have over a 15 YoE writing software and guided coding sessions - that is, using an editor like Zed or VSCode with an LLM integrated, writing code how you normally would but using a flash model to prompt away the annoying parts and/or plan - is as productive as vibe coding, produces sig…

In my comment yesterday i mentioned about "inline autocomplete" is the best way to use LLM in coding, you still lay the foundation, meanwhile the LLM follows you and finish the detail. You are step-locking with the LLM.

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#505
post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I first brought this up late last year – that there used to exist a kind of selection pressure against both developers and against features which would prevent certain functionality from ever being shipped, specifically: - Functionality which exceed the technical ability or knowledge of the developer which built it; and - Functionality which would require an excessive number of changes that time/cost became a constra…

There is a limit, after a few 10,000's of LOC ai projects start disintegrating and becoming unmanageable.

Really?

I just did the LoC measure that isn't "official" but actually closer to how AI would read it: I.e. simply actual lines. Never mind "context window".

Just in the actual source folder there are 1.9 million lines. That's not tokens. Lines. Not even LoC as per some official canonicalized definition. Various languages. ~15 year old code base.

We work with Claude just fine.

For variable measures of "fine" depending on how much devs just trust whatever Claude spits out ;)

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#506

Yes and that's okay. Very few people know how to read assembly, instruction sets, binary or even transistor combos. All those layers have been "left behind" to become specializations. In many ways coding is always about abstracting and LLMs can be a form of "higher level coding". There's lots of problems with this argument, but it's what's happening and we'll be okay. We've always been.

Tell ya what. Go ahead and prompt your agent to build your next project completely from assembly. Why even bother with the higher level inefficiency since it'll be compiled away.

Report back how productive debugging is and the velocity of adding new features to a codebase you can't reason about.

Without strong coding fundamental, this is what it will feel like for the future of the profession.

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#507
post #497

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am in exactly the same position; I don't feel left behind per se but I was just fired for my stance. Management is entirely deluded across the industry, and in my case it was even acknowledged and agreed that my output and the quality of work was not in question, simply the fact that I didn't use LLMs to produce it. I reckon everything needs another 6-18 months to ripen, then those of us who haven't bet the farm on…

Where do (did) you work?

Sydney, a scaleup you probably haven’t heard of and that I am prevented by contract from naming

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#508
wrote this on a different HN thread somewhere, let me reiterate again...

- it is going to be so bad that vast majority of these "i dont write code anymore" guys are going to be unable to write even a c++ hello world program without an LLM

- the argument these guys come up with all the time is "I dont need to"

- Big assumption there buddy, big assumption. Lets play both cases shall we.

- Case 1: LLMs infinitely improve and nobody has to code anymore. Yea well, writing a paragraph spec isnt that hard for me bro, I already do it for every project while not using an LLM

- Case 2: LLMS go bust completely for whatever reason. We have a whole generation of mass programmers and 99% of them cant add 2 numbers in c++. Guess what? I am now one of the most sought after programmers in the entire world and part of an absolute minority

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#509
post #229
post #5

Are engineers still making 100s of thousands a year still just for vibe coding while a nurse and other skilled / highly trained medical professionals working their butt off make half of that? Do we think there is going to be a correction for the vibe coders? Pardon I know such question is controversial but thinking ahead.

I want a world where teachers on average make more than software engineers. If we figure that out, everything else will be fine in the long run.

If there is a severe shortage of labor, that'll happen. I think I remember reading about teachers being paid big bucks in Switzerland?

Re: Coding expertise is going to collapse from AI reliance

#510

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Judging by how it feels being a customer and using their products, I can confidently say: 1. Yes, we know, and can tell. 2. No, they haven't figured out anything. Just vibe coding it with their bleeding dege models.

> No, they haven't figured out anything. Just vibe coding it with their bleeding dege models. I'm sure you were saying "bleeding edge" but my first impression was to translate dege to mean degen/degenerate which made this so much more fun to read.

A new term has been coined! aka "hodl"
Post reply on HN