OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
21–30 of 41 posts
Re: OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
#22Does anyone have suggestions on how I could OCR lots of handwritten math notes with diagrams? I have tons of PDFs waiting for me to manually type them myself and can't justify dedicating weeks to do it.
Re: OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
#23Does anyone have suggestions on how I could OCR lots of handwritten math notes with diagrams? I have tons of PDFs waiting for me to manually type them myself and can't justify dedicating weeks to do it.
I've seen papers using fine-tuned small local vision models to transcribe math into latex. Personally I tried Claude Opus & Claude Code directly to do this. It works (to my surprise) but AI sometimes take guesses that are mathematically right but deviates with my original writing. There is no 100% correct method though.
Its rather interesting if it's correcting a mistake or picking a correct alternative.
How accurate do you think it is overall?
Re: OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
#24Does anyone have suggestions on how I could OCR lots of handwritten math notes with diagrams? I have tons of PDFs waiting for me to manually type them myself and can't justify dedicating weeks to do it.
Local: https://github.com/datalab-to/chandra Hosted: https://www.datalab.to
Another decent option is GLM OCR. It's slightly less accurate but faster and cheaper.
Local: https://github.com/zai-org/GLM-OCR Hosted: https://docs.z.ai/guides/vlm/glm-ocr
Other models such as PaddleOCR, dots.ocr and DeepSeek OCR performed significantly worse.
Re: OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
#25Re: OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
#26Is Tesseract still the best choice for local OCR in 2026? I was always underwhelmed with its real-world performance.
EDIT: I guess one thing is Tesseract will kind of give gibberish back when it fails. The main issue with the LLMs are that instead they take a stab at it (like for a movie poster it'll give part of a quote, or a actor name) back. Makes knowing when it fails a little harder. As long as you have some way to verify when it is likely failing they are very good though.
Re: OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
#27Is Tesseract still the best choice for local OCR in 2026? I was always underwhelmed with its real-world performance.
There's EasyOCR and RapidOCR too, I guess benchmark and see what's best for your material? Oh and Multimodal LLMs :)
Which models are EasyOCR and RapidOCR using?
Re: OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
#28Is Tesseract still the best choice for local OCR in 2026? I was always underwhelmed with its real-world performance.
Re: OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
#29Is Tesseract still the best choice for local OCR in 2026? I was always underwhelmed with its real-world performance.
Re: OCR It – pull text out of un-copyable documents for your LLM
#30Does anyone have suggestions on how I could OCR lots of handwritten math notes with diagrams? I have tons of PDFs waiting for me to manually type them myself and can't justify dedicating weeks to do it.