Our water and power utilities need to re-watch the pilot.
Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
11–20 of 87 posts
Re: Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
#12Sadly, the real lesson we need to learn from Battlestar Galactica is not this. They weren't saved by old software, they were saved by not having critical systems on the network unnecessarily. Our water and power utilities need to re-watch the pilot.
Re: Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
#13hmm
Re: Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
#14It's incredible how far back the surveillance state goes - GSM mobile phones have an IMEI number that's tied to the handset - and the SIM is tied to the subscriber, and your phone broadcasts imei to neighboring towers constantly. I haven't really gotten really into this, but from what I can tell, anything that has to do with mobile phones is strictly worse in terms of anonimity than Wifi. At least anything that ties…
Re: Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
#15Sadly, the real lesson we need to learn from Battlestar Galactica is not this. They weren't saved by old software, they were saved by not having critical systems on the network unnecessarily. Our water and power utilities need to re-watch the pilot.
To be fair, it was both. Those ships that got the recent upgrades also got trojans that Caprica Six put in the defense mainframe with Baltar's access codes.
Re: Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
#16MS-DOS: Over 45 years, and STILL NO remote holes in the default install!
I have also seen virus source code published in books and magazines. We don't have such threats anymore.
Re: Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
#17https://www.theregister.com/on-prem/2018/02/06/ghost-in-the-...
Re: Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
#18Re: Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
#19There are hospitals out there still running on windows XP. Someone's going to skim this article and say "look, we're actually being prudent"!
Re: Why older tech is sometimes safer from hackers
#20I understand BBC may not have the technical background to critically assess this approach, but whoever using Eudora (I loved it in 2001 btw) for security should get their credentials removed via King's order. Security through "obsolescence" is no different from security through obscurity - therefore, it doesn't work. Somebody not bothering to look for holes in your software doesn't mean they don't exist - in the age…
This is BBC Future - the BBC's tech clickbait publisher - not BBC News.
BBC consists of the non-profit news bureau as well as at least a dozen for-profit clickbait and listicle publishers. BBC's ad-free mandate is only for the UK.
> in the age of Claude - I am pretty sure I can destroy your legacy software in minutes
Yep. One of our PortCos has unrestricted access to Anthropic and GPT models. With whitebox testing, it's trivial to identify vulns in legacy environments. With blackbox testing, it takes some effort but it doable with the right steering.