Live data from Hacker News

Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

omarchy.org

81–90 of 122 posts

Re: Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

#81
post #61
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> given that developers are the one group of people today that don't generally have a problem running Linux on the desktop. I am a developer; and I do have a problem: I don't have a choice of good laptops that are guaranteed to work with linux, and preferably come with linux preinstalled. I can go buy a macbook, or a windows laptop; but I can't walk into a store and buy a linux laptop.

System76 is guaranteed to work, right? Also preinstalled if you like. Then there's also Tuxedo (which I understand are only rebranded chinese OEMs but still...)

I don't know any store that actually has system76 laptops, and even we take "online" as a store (I don't) - the laptops are unfortunately not competitive at all.

The sibling comment that suggests framework is much stronger in this respect, and it's a name brand which might actually get the buyers at large stores to take some notice.

Here's hoping.

Re: Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

#83
post #70
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but it's free, what is your point? open source devs should not be paid for their efforts or what?

How will it stay free once these investors that facilitated this 10M funding start asking for their return on investment?

It's not investors, these are donations.

Re: Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

#84
post #43

I am all in seeing more people run Linux and I think this might help the whole ecosystem and other distros long term. That being said I’m a bit concerned about videos like this https://xcancel.com/thestanduppod/status/2091511392717213707 (really hope this is AI generated) and that so many people are okay to give money to David’s project despite his commentary on various societal topics. I like many of David’s technic…

I'm sorry, maybe I'm out of the loop. David said he wants an open group no one cares about politics or whatever you support, you are welcome to join. Seems pretty inclusive?

You can say politics don't matter, but if elsewhere you lay out your controversial opinions, people will self-select whether you like it or not.

And since this is such a predictable thing, it's very likely done intentionally.

Re: Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

#85
post #26
post #6

DHH is like Elon - at some point the personal brand tarnishes the project.

Not if you see the ridiculous codes of conduct projects like Gnome and Nix have - many were begging for an alternative path and DHH brought it. Congrats to him for delivering on it!

There has always existed alternatives to Gnome and Nix.

Re: Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

#86
post #61
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> given that developers are the one group of people today that don't generally have a problem running Linux on the desktop. I am a developer; and I do have a problem: I don't have a choice of good laptops that are guaranteed to work with linux, and preferably come with linux preinstalled. I can go buy a macbook, or a windows laptop; but I can't walk into a store and buy a linux laptop.

System76 is guaranteed to work, right? Also preinstalled if you like. Then there's also Tuxedo (which I understand are only rebranded chinese OEMs but still...)

> Then there's also Tuxedo (which I understand are only rebranded chinese OEMs but still...)

My understanding is that System76 is also a rebranded Chinese/Taiwanese OEM.

Re: Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

#87
post #80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What alternative plan are you implementing?

There are so many modern Linux distributions available, that’s such a weird thing to say

None of the existing ones really made Linux on Desktop "happen", so their numerous and lengthy existence is kind of a counterpoint. The existing ones didn't work, other approaches may need to be tried — at least I commend that some enthusiasts continue trying.

Re: Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

#88

I am all in seeing more people run Linux and I think this might help the whole ecosystem and other distros long term. That being said I’m a bit concerned about videos like this https://xcancel.com/thestanduppod/status/2091511392717213707 (really hope this is AI generated) and that so many people are okay to give money to David’s project despite his commentary on various societal topics. I like many of David’s technic…

But nix is full of crazy clowns.

Re: Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

#89
post #43

I am all in seeing more people run Linux and I think this might help the whole ecosystem and other distros long term. That being said I’m a bit concerned about videos like this https://xcancel.com/thestanduppod/status/2091511392717213707 (really hope this is AI generated) and that so many people are okay to give money to David’s project despite his commentary on various societal topics. I like many of David’s technic…

I'm sorry, maybe I'm out of the loop. David said he wants an open group no one cares about politics or whatever you support, you are welcome to join. Seems pretty inclusive?

I am not saying this is the case here. I don't know DHH much, and I don't really care for the whole situation. But using and fronting 'openness' (especially around the 'no-politics', which is political, thing) is a typical way to create non-mixed, non-open community.

The idea is you claim to be open to everyone. This includes people who are judged to be undesirable elsewhere. In fact, you make sure those people want to join by specifically targeting and vilifying specific organization (in this case, you could say Nix or whoever he is talking about). So, by design, you don't create a mixed community, but one with the specific population that feels rejected by whatever or whoever you are targeting/opposing. Because of this concentration of a specific population, member of the organization you are targeting will not be welcomed (which mean it is not truly open). They are on paper, but nobody wants to be part of a community made in majority by people who dislike you. Now, all this can be used actually for good, for example to create community for the oppressed marginalized or whatever. But it can also very easily be turned into a fascist utopia. It alls come to how you set the rules and how you enforce them within the community, and also simply the people that you are trying to group up. Trying to create a community for disabled people to push for more accessibility within free-software is laudable. Trying to group up people who thinks X or Y are 'clown' usually only lead to the creation of negativity-focused/ego-driven communities.

EDIT: Also, and this is more my (very subjective) opinion, but people who are fronting 'no-politics', 'openness' with no clear claim that whoever they are pointing to are not open, and typically talk about free-speech (not the case here), are typically PoS with big egos who got rejected from the main communities for being PoS and now want to create their own PoS community. See also twitter

EDIT2: Actually, an easy example of this is with reddit. There is often subreddit that I created in reaction of moderation and people being ban from main subreddit X or Y. If you go and look at those communities, they are usually not of very high quality, even more trigger happy on the ban hammer, and have a single focus on what got them ban from the main subreddit in the first place. A very easy example is r/europe vs r/europe_sub. The latter being extremely, if not entirely focused on immigration and being borderline or openly racist.

Re: Omacom Foundation funding hits $10M

#90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's what happens when tech bros run a Linux distro https://omarchy.org/news/2026/09/the-omarchy-core-team/

Linux (and all OSes) and computers in general are what you get when tech bros are let loose on the world.

The term tech bro is a pejorative for men who work in tech who are obnoxious, often sexist, have an inflated ego, and are generally pretty toxic for everybody around. And are now very aligned with American nationalism and reactionary ideas. It’s not really something you should be proud of.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tech_bro

Post reply on HN