Live data from Hacker News

Anthropic candidates face blunt money question

axios.com

21–30 of 70 posts

Re: Anthropic candidates face blunt money question

#22
The worst is that I don't believe a single second that Amodei and his crew are not greed motivated in the end. Otherwise his company would be a lot different, more open, more open source, more available to help good cause without benefit.

What I see is more the god syndrome of persons that have are in power and have an edge. He can make the conditions so it is important for him to appear as a "divine leader", that is capable to "inspire others" with whatever is the right thing that it decides. I'm quite sure that he will not tolerate debate still.

But obviously he will not see himself like that, but will be persuaded that he is a world changer and saving the world.

Re: Anthropic candidates face blunt money question

#23
post #8

I hate these types of questions because they're not just selecting for people dedicated to the mission, they're also selecting for people who are convincing liars

What’s the alternative? Selecting people without caring at all about their character?

I agree with the parent commenter – it's too on the nose.

If you were concerned about someone's character then you need to ask questions which really help you to understand who the person is – not questions which are easy to game by lying.

I'd argue asking something like someone's opinion on veganism is a better question because it might help you understand how the person thinks about the types of harms Anthropic are concerned about without being such an easy thing to lie about.

Obviously they could say "yeah, I think veganism is good", but someone who actually inhabited that view or was just conflicted about balancing meat consumption and the suffering of animals would probably answer with a lot more nuance that helps you understand how that person thinks about similar kinds of ethical concerns.

Re: Anthropic candidates face blunt money question

#25
post #4

> One applicant — who spoke to Axios on the condition of anonymity for fear of hurting future job opportunities — recalled being asked how they would feel if the company someday abandoned its AI ambitions for safety reasons, and that decision sent the stock to zero. Is that a scoop? I thought that was a well known thing with Anthropic interview process. They were very transparent about it beforehand from what I remem…

I don't agree with some things Anthropic does but that is a cool thing.

Re: Anthropic candidates face blunt money question

#26

The worst is that I don't believe a single second that Amodei and his crew are not greed motivated in the end. Otherwise his company would be a lot different, more open, more open source, more available to help good cause without benefit. What I see is more the god syndrome of persons that have are in power and have an edge. He can make the conditions so it is important for him to appear as a "divine leader", that is…

Presumably you're also greed motivated, because you don't work without benefit.

Re: Anthropic candidates face blunt money question

#28
post #4

> One applicant — who spoke to Axios on the condition of anonymity for fear of hurting future job opportunities — recalled being asked how they would feel if the company someday abandoned its AI ambitions for safety reasons, and that decision sent the stock to zero. Is that a scoop? I thought that was a well known thing with Anthropic interview process. They were very transparent about it beforehand from what I remem…

Isn't the obvious response that they should offer a comparable comp package without any sort of stock aspect?

Re: Anthropic candidates face blunt money question

#29

"Damn kids today, working for their money, not mine!" Since Dario believes in the mission, he should give away all his stock and work for a regular employee salary

But what if someone else ends up making the world a better place better than they do?

Re: Anthropic candidates face blunt money question

#30
post #4

> One applicant — who spoke to Axios on the condition of anonymity for fear of hurting future job opportunities — recalled being asked how they would feel if the company someday abandoned its AI ambitions for safety reasons, and that decision sent the stock to zero. Is that a scoop? I thought that was a well known thing with Anthropic interview process. They were very transparent about it beforehand from what I remem…

It would be a decent interview question if such a large portion of compensation did not come from equity.

Otherwise it's basically the same as asking how someone would feel if all the sudden they lost 50% or more of their wealth. No one feels okay about that, except maybe the delusional few.

Post reply on HN