Live data from Hacker News

Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?

slate.com

101–110 of 166 posts

Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?

#101
post #33

Yep, this is the sort of thing happens when you've deeply internalized that trustworthiness and continuity is not important. Microsoft today is not a serious company, it is not run by serious people, and it is at the forefront of a deeply unserious industry.

What does "serious" mean in this context?

competent, wishing to be competent, and not having your leadership suffer a psychotic break with reality: https://isolveproblems.substack.com/p/how-microsoft-vaporize...

Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?

#102
post #33

Yep, this is the sort of thing happens when you've deeply internalized that trustworthiness and continuity is not important. Microsoft today is not a serious company, it is not run by serious people, and it is at the forefront of a deeply unserious industry.

What does "serious" mean in this context?

[deleted]

Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?

#104
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does "serious" mean in this context?

It's just an internet meme phrase. "X is not a serious Y" just means that X is a joke. It's a dumb phrase and overused in contexts like this.

That’s not the meaning here. It means that Microsoft lacks the qualities required to be taken seriously, like competence or reliability.

Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?

#106
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about Azure? Looks like it takes more revenue than Windows and Office put together.

Azure is Microsoft's attempt to get into the market that Amazon dominates with AWS. Microsoft traditionally was a software company. Microsoft today is a desperate company trying to make money and stay relevant in a world fed up with the bull crap that they have been peddling over the years. Windows could have been so much more and better, but it's now a sold out clown show, just like XBox, just like Office, just like…

IMO it all started going downhill for Microslop with Windows Product Activation in Windows XP. That was the first shot across the bow and sign they were going to be user-hostile.

Now they want to neuter the KMS server emulators.

Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?

#109
post #19
post #3

Cloud is nice if it works. Web hosting is nice if you pay for it. In history timeline, future archaeologists will probably see almost nothing, some books… as we are used to past centuries. But clouds, servers… gone. BTW don’t use SSD for archiving.

Never keep your data and your backups in the same place. That’s true for in-office servers, data-centres and cloud. If you must use cloud, use two different providers for your own services and backups. Also, have a disaster recovery plan ready, and exercise it regularly.

It really can't be understated how many non-profits operate on a shoestring budget and over-extend that few staff they can afford as a standard operating procedure, and have very low technical skill among everyone as they're mission-focused with what little resources they have.

I've worked with and for a couple non-profits where IT help was someone's spouse or kid or brother willing to help out. Often I've been the spouse. Often a shared Google drive filled with poorly managed PII is the solution that works well enough...until something bad happens.

Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?

#110
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MS's core product is and always has been Office, specifically Excel. Windows is simply the delivery method

What about Azure? Looks like it takes more revenue than Windows and Office put together.

Does it now.

Azure's cost of revenue is someplace between 14% (Productivity and Business Processes) and 36% (Intelligent Cloud). Software is 1%.

Looks to me like Software pays for the whole thing.

Post reply on HN