Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. Disclosure: I work at Microsoft. But I also am the volunteer IT guy at a nonprofit, and am speaking entirely in that context. I was quite unhappy to get a mail back in (checks archives) January that our grant would be discontinued and we’d either have to make do with the web versions of things, migrate someplace, or start paying. They also reminded us several more times before the drop date. I don’t really under…
If 150,000+ organisations were caught by surprise, I would say it’s clear whatever communication they had was not adequate. Organisations that didn’t have an off-boarding option (do nothing, pay the minimum, I’ll deal with it) selected should receive monthly reminders, then every 2 weeks (to multiple people), and one per week until a VERY alarming one the week before. And, of course, have all systems shut down and th…
Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
31–40 of 166 posts
Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
#32Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
#33Yep, this is the sort of thing happens when you've deeply internalized that trustworthiness and continuity is not important. Microsoft today is not a serious company, it is not run by serious people, and it is at the forefront of a deeply unserious industry.
Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
#34Yep, this is the sort of thing happens when you've deeply internalized that trustworthiness and continuity is not important. Microsoft today is not a serious company, it is not run by serious people, and it is at the forefront of a deeply unserious industry.
What does "serious" mean in this context?
It's a dumb phrase and overused in contexts like this.
Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
#35People are better off using LibreOffice on a Linux desktop
As a daily Linux user and enthusiast, I detest statements like this. You did not read the article not the problem that those companies have and your only solution is "Use LibreOffice" without any actual interest in what their problem is or what an actual solution to their problems is. People like you push newbies away from Linux. Using LibreOffice does not give you web sharing, nor permission systems, nor automation…
Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
#36I'm a tenant admin for a non profit. Just looked and I have 8 emails to two different addresses warning me about the transition. None were caught in the Microsoft or Fastmail spam filters.
Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
#37Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
#38The cloud is a convenience at most and an expensive one. You do everything you need to do somewhere else and pray that no one else gets in or you get shot.
This is a warning to everyone else. Heed it.
Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
#39Cloud is nice if it works. Web hosting is nice if you pay for it. In history timeline, future archaeologists will probably see almost nothing, some books… as we are used to past centuries. But clouds, servers… gone. BTW don’t use SSD for archiving.
Re: Over 170k Nonprofits Lost All Their Data. Is Microsoft to Blame?
#40Yep, this is the sort of thing happens when you've deeply internalized that trustworthiness and continuity is not important. Microsoft today is not a serious company, it is not run by serious people, and it is at the forefront of a deeply unserious industry.
What does "serious" mean in this context?
When people say a company is unserious they almost always mean that they're not thinking about, and taking seriously, the work that their customers do. This seems like a classic example of that.