Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
1–10 of 91 posts
Re: Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
#2This is a non-story; for those who haven’t read them, prospectuses include every potential risk under the sun. There will be risks that never make the news alongside the exciting backlash.
Re: Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
#3negative sentiment towards AI and data centers will be listed as a risk factor
The fact that the technology can "hallucinate" and is unreliable is not just a "sentiment" --- it is a well established fact. And it is more than a risk, it is virtually guaranteed to happen if you use it repeatedly.
Calling it "sentiment" is like an "alternative fact".
Re: Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
#4negative sentiment towards AI and data centers will be listed as a risk factor The fact that the technology can "hallucinate" and is unreliable is not just a "sentiment" --- it is a well established fact. And it is more than a risk, it is virtually guaranteed to happen if you use it repeatedly. Calling it "sentiment" is like an "alternative fact".
...what? I don't think they're talking about hallucinations here, they're talking about public opinion.
Re: Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
#5negative sentiment towards AI and data centers will be listed as a risk factor The fact that the technology can "hallucinate" and is unreliable is not just a "sentiment" --- it is a well established fact. And it is more than a risk, it is virtually guaranteed to happen if you use it repeatedly. Calling it "sentiment" is like an "alternative fact".
...what? I don't think they're talking about hallucinations here, they're talking about public opinion.
Is it just an "opinion" if it is based on proven facts?
Re: Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
...what? I don't think they're talking about hallucinations here, they're talking about public opinion.
Is it just an "opinion" if it is based on proven facts?
Yes. Let’s say I saw a person kill someone. That’s a fact, but my perception of them would be low; that is an opinion.
I think it’s really swell how the last 10 years have made it so the basic difference between fact and opinion is not totally obvious.
Re: Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
...what? I don't think they're talking about hallucinations here, they're talking about public opinion.
Is it just an "opinion" if it is based on proven facts?
"Public Opinion" -
Public opinion, or popular opinion, is the collective opinion on a specific topic or voting intention relevant to society. It is the people's views on matters affecting them (From Wikipedia)
It has nothing to do with fact. It broadly represents peoples views, factual or otherwise.
Re: Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
#8This is a non-story; for those who haven’t read them, prospectuses include every potential risk under the sun. There will be risks that never make the news alongside the exciting backlash.
“Everyone hates us and the very fundamentals of what we are promising, will fight to prevent us establishing infrastructure, may pass laws to limit our activities in their states, and will extend that hatred to our major investors, potentially materially damaging their businesses” is not a common thing in an IPO prospectus, I imagine, for quite obvious reasons.
But that is the gist of the situation is it not? If it’s an honest statement, it is going to say something like this.
Which prospectus got close to anything like this? People hate SpaceX products less.
Re: Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
#9negative sentiment towards AI and data centers will be listed as a risk factor The fact that the technology can "hallucinate" and is unreliable is not just a "sentiment" --- it is a well established fact. And it is more than a risk, it is virtually guaranteed to happen if you use it repeatedly. Calling it "sentiment" is like an "alternative fact".
its a bit sad that the public can't grasp tools that have high variance but still end up being useful. lots of things in real life follow the same pattern yet when it comes to AI..
Re: Anthropic IPO filing will show AI backlash as a risk factor, sources say
#10This is a non-story; for those who haven’t read them, prospectuses include every potential risk under the sun. There will be risks that never make the news alongside the exciting backlash.
“Everyone hates us and the very fundamentals of what we are promising, will fight to prevent us establishing infrastructure, may pass laws to limit our activities in their states, and will extend that hatred to our major investors, potentially materially damaging their businesses” is not a common thing in an IPO prospectus, I imagine, for quite obvious reasons. But that is the gist of the situation is it not? If it’s…
The non-story part is that they would include this risk even if it were 5 people.