[deleted]
Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
21–30 of 129 posts
Re: Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
LSP is a well known term among programmers these days.
Not if an LLM writes your code. I get thousands of lines of high quality Rust per day without ever stepping into VScode.
> Not if an LLM writes your code. I get thousands of lines of high quality Rust per day without ever stepping into VScode.
LSPs are orthogonal to both LLMs and VSCode. For example, see Metals[0].
Re: Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
People communicate with regards to the audience they expect. This is why Rust (it’s a systems programming language) and LSP (the language server protocol invented by VS Code) are not explained in the article. I am hoping I don’t have to define the words I used, but if in doubt, Google or ChatGPT are your friends.
It makes sense to always explain acronyms. I always do to avoid random people reaching out for more explanations
[deleted]
Re: Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
#24RA with disk cache?
Re: Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
I made myself an expert at Rust before I started using LLM's, and I review the code.
Props to you. I've been writing Rust for around 7 years now and I couldn't QA 1000s of lines per day.
We sample it, and upon finding problems, adjust the system to eliminate that class of problems in the future.
Re: Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
I made myself an expert at Rust before I started using LLM's, and I review the code.
You made yourself an expert in Rust and have never heard of an LSP? This seems surprising to me given that Rust was one of the first languages to broadly advertise a toolchain and editor integrations which rely on the technology.
I just put VScode in vim mode and rely on its basic symbol completion. My goal has always been to write as little as possible by thinking out the minimum solution. The simpler the code, the easier it is to reason about and to maintain.
Re: Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Props to you. I've been writing Rust for around 7 years now and I couldn't QA 1000s of lines per day.
We sample it, and upon finding problems, adjust the system to eliminate that class of problems in the future.
Did you just create a new account so you could keep arguing with people?
Re: Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not if an LLM writes your code. I get thousands of lines of high quality Rust per day without ever stepping into VScode.
Very little quality, let alone high-quality, code is written in VSCode.
This is an astonishing assertion. Can you back that up with evidence?
Re: Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
#29Hey! Author here.
Happy to answer any questions.
Re: Rust Glancer: Rust LSP using 100x less RAM
#30RA with disk cache?
In a way. It uses a different architecture, so it's not exactly "RA with something", but the main idea is similar: everything is on the disk, stuff is loaded only when it's needed.