Live data from Hacker News

Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

kagi.com

341–350 of 421 posts

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#341

The one thing I find slightly grating about links to Kagi blogs is the top comments are almost always "I use Kagi and it's great!" rather than about the content of the blog. And I'm a happy Kagi subscriber! I get that this is an option, but what it really shows to me is how broken the model for journalism is. In my view you almost always only get good-quality journalism if you pay for it. (Somehow - e.g. the BBC is p…

> We can't even agree on a single setting that says you don't want advertising cookies!

We can't, because the website owners don't want one. They want there to be no standard, because then it's more likely that some people will accidentally allow them.

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#342
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Do people want actual journalism to go out of business? Former Google Contributor user reporting in! I absolutely do not want normal journalism going out of business, but I’m not going to subscribe to Bloomberg or FT or any of those sites on a recurring basis for one article. I love the idea of paying a non-subscription for one thing, occasionally, though!

Don’t Bloomberg & FT have a number of well-written, informative articles every month? Maybe you just want the exclusives which even then they often break stuff (at least Gurman on Bloomberg, especially if you care about Apple/OpenAI).

Yes, so does Economist, The Verge and many many other sites.

But I'm interested in maybe 3 articles a month. If I were to pay for them it's like paying for Netflix and watching a movie a month. Or subscribing to a dead-tree newspaper and only reading the comics.

I do get that micropayments are hard, but it's not a technical issue - it never has been. It's all about credit card costs and legalese.

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#343

The one thing I find slightly grating about links to Kagi blogs is the top comments are almost always "I use Kagi and it's great!" rather than about the content of the blog. And I'm a happy Kagi subscriber! I get that this is an option, but what it really shows to me is how broken the model for journalism is. In my view you almost always only get good-quality journalism if you pay for it. (Somehow - e.g. the BBC is p…

The biggest problem with micropayments is how credit card payment processors work. You typically pay a percentage fee. But they thought of everything, so you also pay a flat fee per transaction like 10 cents. So they can get their money from tiny transaction. So for something like a 20 cent micropayment, you pay more to your processor than you pocket. One solution is a universal token system or something like it. You…

That's not how a micropayments system would work, and you don't need a token system.

It would work similarly to how my transit card works. I use a credit card to put some amount of money on the card itself, say $20, and then every time I use transit, the payment system just deducts $2.85 from my balance. Once my balance goes below a threshold I set, it charges my card again to top up the balance.

So instead of seven $2.85 charges, there's one $20 charge.

A micropayments system would charge you that $20 once, and then deduct 20¢ from your balance every time you read an article. For 100 articles, you've charged the card only once.

It would work similarly on the website side: the micropayments platform wouldn't send a deposit over to the website owner every single time a visitor paid 20¢; it would aggregate payments and either pay out on a timed schedule, or when some minimum dollar amount is reached.

You don't need a token system for this; denominating the "wallet" balance in dollars (or whatever the user's currency is) is fine. A token system might be useful in order to make pricing easier from the website operator's side, but IMO they suck because they hide the actual amount of money the user is paying. It sort of like when you visit a foreign country where you're not familiar with the currency, and so you see that something costs 1,000,000 foobits, and it has no meaning to you, because the exchange rate with your own currency is something like 1:4285.

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#344
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are some defects like what does this mean? > dir="auto" rather than inheriting the story's direction: quotes are reproduced verbatim, so a Hebrew story routinely carries an English one. Inheriting rtl left its closing punctuation stranded at the start of the line (KNEWS-453). --> https://news.kagi.com/s/3gskhn

Kagi dev here, sorry about the bug; we had a malformed nested HTML comment that ended up partially rendering. This is now fixed.

Hey, I remember reading along before and around the time you were “officially” hired – happy Kagi could recognize your work, and seemingly continues to do so :)

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#345
post #227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The biggest problem with micropayments is how credit card payment processors work. You typically pay a percentage fee. But they thought of everything, so you also pay a flat fee per transaction like 10 cents. So they can get their money from tiny transaction. So for something like a 20 cent micropayment, you pay more to your processor than you pocket. One solution is a universal token system or something like it. You…

The only way that will work is if each publisher has their own token system, otherwise you have created a new middleman who will want to take their own cut. That middleman will also have to deal with similar problems as payment processors, such as fraud. Perhaps it will be to a lesser degree, because it would be a less valuable target, but it would still add to costs. Then you run into all sorts of other problems. Ho…

Of course they'll take their own cut, but that's fine. We accept (sometimes grudgingly) that credit card issuers and networks get their own cut, so there's easy precedent here.

> How do you price articles?

The same way anything else in life is priced: you price at whatever the market can bear.

> And how do you charge for the article? Is it 1 token per view or 1 token for unlimited views?

Also precedent there: online video rental/"purchase". You can decide what model you like better, and see if people want to pay what you ask. You can even offer both, just as is the case for many videos on Amazon, for example.

> but adjust the price of the 5 token article to 10 tokens and you may cut the readership in half.

Yes, that's one of the pitfalls of setting pricing, that every business has to deal with. Note that this problem is present with the monthly subscription model too: half of New York Times subscribers might cancel if the subscription price doubled.

That's a general problem with pricing: determining how much you can raise your price without losing an equivalent (or greater) amount of revenue due to losing customers.

(As an aside, sometimes doubling your prices and exactly halving your customer base is desirable. Fewer customers to deal with at the same overall revenue level might be a net positive. But of course losing a single customer then becomes twice as bad as losing a single customer at the previous pricing.)

> On top of all of that, the consumer probably doesn't want the cognitive burden of keeping track of all of this stuff.

This is the real issue from the consumer side. People like all-you-can-eat plans. They would much rather make a payment decision once, and then get "free" articles to read on an ongoing basis, than have to make a payment decision for every single article they think they might want to read.

> They have demonstrated time and time again that they would rather sell monthly subscriptions than access to articles.

Yup. Recurring subscription revenue is stable and predictable; one-time per-article revenue is not.

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#347

I would pay for Brave or Kagi for like $2-3 per month if one of them supported private payments(actually that's exactly what Brave costs). Paying should get you more privacy not less. I'm not paying for Kagi because it's expensive and also doesn't support private payments and Brave has better UI for me. Brave blocks their own ads while not supporting private payments and it doesn't let you use the search premium in V…

I wish there was some kind of EFF-curated "privacy/internet freedom" pass that I could buy. Kagi is great, but it's not everything. Brave is great, but it's not everything. Signal, GrapheneOS, Tor... this is a battle with many fronts and it's kind of labor intensive to manage a whole bunch of subscriptions/recurring donations. I'd love to just buy the pass and rest assured that if one of the recipients of that money…

There was this https://blog.torproject.org/funding-internet-freedom-togethe...

That's a good idea and it could give you a checklist to select the projects you want to support.

Signal, Tor, and GrapheneOS(through github) have monthly recurring option so you can just set that up once.

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#348
post #295
post #3

I've been enjoying Kagi for the last couple years. Even as LLMs slurp up most of the internet and replace search I think Kagi is still useful. Reddit has recently blocked access to old reddit without an account and the ability to filter out stuff like that is useful.

NEW Reddit has recently started blocking logged-out access too. Stupid modal popup with "Join the most real place on the internet" (yeah, right) banner that appears after about 20 seconds. I'm not logging in to my private account from a work machine that's MITMd for "security", just to browse search results or take a short break! (I've been a user for nearly 21 years, but using it less and less with each stupid choic…

Yes "the most real place" where they can just ban you whenever (the site, or its legions of - installed? - subreddit mods)

Re: Kagi added a setting for removing paywalled links from search results

#350

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My household is hooked on the AI Assistant. It’s heartwarming to be able to buy consumer software that just works. If only Kagi had a Shopping feature, then it would be a complete solution for us.

You know now that I think of it me too. I absolutely never used the free google one because I never trusted it (you know what they say about free things). If I'm paying for it through Kagi, I could at least trust their incentives are aligned with mine instead of whoever is paying them the most.

Google shopping is a great tool to use when you don't care if the items are truly in stock or are sold at the price listed.
Post reply on HN