Anthropic needs some model with a fancy name so they can pretend for another while that their model is so powerful it will destroy the world if released. I propose Claude Legend 6.
Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
11–20 of 56 posts
Re: Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
#12> Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders This dance is quite annoying. When Anthropic releases a paid model, the user should control what it does and doesn't do. The other day I had a security incident that required urgent response. ChatGPT and Claude were utterly useless (I quickly attempted to get access to the former's advanced security capabilities but was met with a form I c…
Re: Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
#13For those who had access, how does it compare IRL with GLM 5.3 ? iirc both models are similar in terms of benchmarks ?
Re: Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
#14Re: Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
#15> Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders This dance is quite annoying. When Anthropic releases a paid model, the user should control what it does and doesn't do. The other day I had a security incident that required urgent response. ChatGPT and Claude were utterly useless (I quickly attempted to get access to the former's advanced security capabilities but was met with a form I c…
Re: Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
#16For those who had access, how does it compare IRL with GLM 5.3 ? iirc both models are similar in terms of benchmarks ?
I’ve been working on a decompilation project that fable was choking on and GLM 5.3 has been chunking away at it for 72 hours now? I think it’s my favorite agentic/implementer model right now.
Re: Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
#17This week I found two issues in my company codebase. After finding them I told a claude session about one and asked for a quick proof of concept demo of the exploit. It refused, including refusing simple things in the same session afterwards. Meanwhile same model in a new tab, say I need help creating a page that hits an endpoint with a special payload and it does the same things that were too dangerous in the previo…
I eventually gave up and just asked it to fix the issue. The first thing it did? Write a PoC to verify the issue was still valid...
Re: Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
#18In a world where things such as GLM-5.3, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, and Kimi-K3 exists, this is a bit laughable. Anthropic needs some model with a fancy name so they can pretend for another while that their model is so powerful it will destroy the world if released. I propose Claude Legend 6.
Re: Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
#19In a world where things such as GLM-5.3, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, and Kimi-K3 exists, this is a bit laughable. Anthropic needs some model with a fancy name so they can pretend for another while that their model is so powerful it will destroy the world if released. I propose Claude Legend 6.
Re: Bringing the cybersecurity capabilities of Claude Mythos 5 to more defenders
#20For those who had access, how does it compare IRL with GLM 5.3 ? iirc both models are similar in terms of benchmarks ?
I’ve been working on a decompilation project that fable was choking on and GLM 5.3 has been chunking away at it for 72 hours now? I think it’s my favorite agentic/implementer model right now.
I have a feeling what we are about to see on HuggingFace is not the GLM 5.3 that you're using now.