131–140 of 174 posts
This is self-contradictory. Either you want to critique something or you do not. Make up your mind.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's simply that a font won't solve anything. That concept is worst than security by obscurity, as it causes more problem and add more constraints than what it solves... for a very limited time until AI bots are adjusted to decode those fonts properly.
how can you make such a bold claim so early with 0 evidence? A successful (and much more realistic outcome) could be to make a font that is financially infeasible for LLMs to parse but easy for humans.
So there’s plenty of evidence.
Now provide evidence it’s technically possible to make any font “ that is financially infeasible for LLMs to parse but easy for humans.”
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Accessibility isn't optional, so what do you propose?
I propose using the internet the way it was designed: Open and readable by everything (including bots). Scraping is a legal issue. There is no technical prevention mechanism that isn't theater.
The problem is... it's a legal issue we cannot solve. America and China are large enough to not give a fuck about what everyone else wants.
Cool.
I don't foresee anti-AI fonts being widely adopted. I see them largely as the symbolic saber rattling of intellectual property trolls.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Qualitative assessment etc not just metrics. How do you propose to asses “overall benefit to humanity” with metrics?
Number of successful outcomes reported (e.g. with disabled students, cancer patients). Labor costs. Latency of services. Scientific discoveries found. Etc. I'm not trying to discount the qualitative approach, but I think it's not impossibly hard to find metrics we can associate with "overall benefit to humanity" from a quantitative viewpoint.
One would hope for the slightly higher ambition of metrics that are causally connected to "overall benefit of humanity", settling for merely correlated has that unpleasant risk of the association breaking as you try to optimise.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this bait? Wtf haha
If the comment baited you, maybe it's because you're holding onto a popular but nonsensical belief system, and you're experiencing painful cognitive dissonance.