Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Maybe the real issue is selective outrage about legal injustice." The real issue is selective enforcement of the law. If it applied equally to everyone, then more people would be outraged as it affected them.
Perfectly equal enforcement really isn't possible, but it should be the policy to enforce in proportion to active harm. The bigger the ongoing active harm, the quicker to react we should be. Some individual torrents a single movie? NBD. No matter the side of the argument you are on this should be ignored. A company intentionally throws content strikes causing legitimate harm to large numbers of content creators? That…
Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
201–210 of 427 posts
Re: Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
#202Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perfectly equal enforcement really isn't possible, but it should be the policy to enforce in proportion to active harm. The bigger the ongoing active harm, the quicker to react we should be. Some individual torrents a single movie? NBD. No matter the side of the argument you are on this should be ignored. A company intentionally throws content strikes causing legitimate harm to large numbers of content creators? That…
Finland links speeding fines to income. I'd like to see something that get far broader application. That prevents the wealthy or huge corporations from seeing lawbreaking as a business cost, without destroying a small business or individual who commits the same crime.
Re: Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
#203Re: Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
#204The part that still bothers me so much about the US vs Swartz case is that JSTOR didn't pursue civil litigation against Aaron. It was the US government that pursued him. There was little for the government to lose in the case. In a case vs Meta, at the scale it has reached, it could have wide ranging economic implications limiting the investment in AI, which the US is absolutely not willing to pursue at this point in…
I think the root problem is Corporations being Legal Persons. An alternative would be the CEO to be the “legal person” of each Corp. and be the one against all legal actions should be targeted. In that case it would Zack himself the one facing any legal action. A Corp’s actions result to the death of a person. CEO should be trialed as if they were the one driving the car.
Re: Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Maybe the real issue is selective outrage about legal injustice." The real issue is selective enforcement of the law. If it applied equally to everyone, then more people would be outraged as it affected them.
[flagged]
We are not asserting that any specific outcome is empirically superior to another just that given the facts of the case, it was not adjudicated fairy given what we know of similar cases.
Re: Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
>How would it help the world for Aaron Swartz to download 3.5 million research and primary source PDFs Knowledge is power.
Re: Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
#207I don't like talking about this, but first hand knowledge is rarer by the day, and there are entire organizations profiting off this mythology. It's pissing me off. Aaron is not a data point to build stupid metaphors around. He was a bright and broken child. Aaron attracted influential and creepy people and was ill-equipped to handle it. He was also working through a period of sexual awakening while being used by old…
Can you give any more details ? I've never heard about this but sad if true
Re: Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
#208I don't like talking about this, but first hand knowledge is rarer by the day, and there are entire organizations profiting off this mythology. It's pissing me off. Aaron is not a data point to build stupid metaphors around. He was a bright and broken child. Aaron attracted influential and creepy people and was ill-equipped to handle it. He was also working through a period of sexual awakening while being used by old…
i wasn't there and i didn't know him, but talking about a 26 year old man like this makes it seem like you're just taking away his autonomy
Re: Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
the sentences that US courts dream up around digital offences are absolutely obscene and seem to only exist as a means of coercion. However because they're still technically real and it feels disgusting.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Swartz#United_States_v._... The prosecution offered 6 months in low security in a plea deal. He had been mass downloading and evading them at MIT for months until he had MIT and FBI involved and was finally caught on camera. I bring this up because A. maximum exposure to charges are rarely applied but makes great headlines for outrage and B. the plea deal seems reasonable to someon…
I think it is the criminal record. Other places in the world, once you've served your time you can often go right back to living. Not that it is easy but it doesn't hang over you.
In the US, once you have a criminal record - any criminal record - there are flow on effects that keep fucking with you for life.
Re: Aaron Swartz was prosecuted for scraping, while Meta does it without consequence
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
Finland links speeding fines to income. I'd like to see something that get far broader application. That prevents the wealthy or huge corporations from seeing lawbreaking as a business cost, without destroying a small business or individual who commits the same crime.
In the US speeding can lead to your license being removed and then you can't drive at all. Speeding is not just a fine.
Edit: should have said 'poor tax'