Live data from Hacker News

Bun 1.4

bun.com

141–150 of 198 posts

Re: Bun 1.4

#141
post #103

This was an incredible demo for Claude. The runtime hosted Claude Code for months and I never saw the slightest issue. Wholly machine ported. Truly amazing.

And all the vibe code tests were against Claude? Let's port the Linux kernel and run all tests against a single application only!

Re: Bun 1.4

#142
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How are you deciding that either of these things worked out fine

bun has lesser memory issues, more bug fixes shipped than ever before. same happening across the board with chrome, mozilla etc. twitter has (irrespective of the political turmoil etc.) purely as a technical product added more users, more features etc. to me that seems like it worked out fine.

You're celebrating Bun 1.4 on literally day one. I'd suggest waiting for it to hit prod.

    irrespective of the political turmoil etc
Quite the hand-wave!

Re: Bun 1.4

#143
post #26

This is a huge win for Bun & Anthropic. I've been keeping an eye on Bun development cycle since they announced the Rust rewrite and the huge drama and backlash it generated. They seem to be proving the skeptics wrong with this release.

It's way late and seriously over budget, hard to call that a success.

This couldn't be further from the truth. It was if anything severely under budget of you compare it to what it'd normally cost in engineering time.

Re: Bun 1.4

#144
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think around $300-400k, but that does not include the github issue/pr/ci stuff that runs continuously, which could double or triple it. Somewhere, the first two weeks were said to be about $200k.

That total assumes API billing rates, which isn't what Anthropic pays for the inference. So I'm confused why people keep quoting that. It's not representative of what it'd cost for you either because you could use cheaper models.

> That total assumes API billing rates, which isn't what Anthropic pays for the inference. So I'm confused why people keep quoting that. It's not representative of what it'd cost for you either because you could use cheaper models.

It is, because this rewrite was marketing for Claude. So it reflects the price for what other companies might need to pay if they want to rewrite something else with similar size.

Re: Bun 1.4

#145
post #103

This was an incredible demo for Claude. The runtime hosted Claude Code for months and I never saw the slightest issue. Wholly machine ported. Truly amazing.

We're never going to know how much it cost and how many hours of engineering time it took behind the scenes.

Re: Bun 1.4

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

bun has lesser memory issues, more bug fixes shipped than ever before. same happening across the board with chrome, mozilla etc. twitter has (irrespective of the political turmoil etc.) purely as a technical product added more users, more features etc. to me that seems like it worked out fine.

You're celebrating Bun 1.4 on literally day one. I'd suggest waiting for it to hit prod. irrespective of the political turmoil etc Quite the hand-wave!

claude code uses bun written rust. and it has been in prod for a month or so. I am finding it hard not to celebrate because it was quite literally a +1M -4K line change that is touching people today.

> irrespective of the political turmoil.

I was mostly concerned with the technical perspective of firing 80% of people by stack ranking. the consensus in HN at the time was that twitter had months left before all production systems burn down, because all the organizational knowledge has left. but seems like firing 80% went just fine for them. which I find fascinating.

Re: Bun 1.4

#147

Absolute crickets from the "there's no way LLM's can rewrite Bun to Rust this quickly, it's going to be buggy, it's marketing" crowd Comments here 3 months ago are quite something: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48132488

Sure I’ll bite the obvious bait, why not. > Absolute crickets from the "there's no way LLM's can rewrite Bun to Rust this quickly, it's going to be buggy, it's marketing" crowd > Comments here 3 months ago are quite something: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48132488 Did you… perhaps read the entire comment you just posted? The crowd that was saying “no way they did that in 11 days” sure seems correct given that…

Not sure why people try so hard to interpret this in such a hostile way. It's very obvious that the 11 days were for the faithful, mechanical, agentic port, and then they followed up by commanding refactoring. The comments about the faithful port not being idiomatic rust are annoying

Re: Bun 1.4

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's way late and seriously over budget, hard to call that a success.

This couldn't be further from the truth. It was if anything severely under budget of you compare it to what it'd normally cost in engineering time.

[deleted]

Re: Bun 1.4

#149
post #45

So this is kind of a systemd for web developers. All functionality is absorbed into a vibe coded, un-auditable black box. Maybe run it as process 1 in a future ClaudeOS.

>All functionality is absorbed into a vibe coded, un-auditable black box.

As opposed to the famously stable and robust JS ecosystem.

Though it feels like the web tooling is thankfully moving away from JS/Node

EG webpack in js => rspack (rust) typescript in typescript => typescript in go (the loss of bootstrapping is a bit sad but worth it)

Re: Bun 1.4

#150
post #113
post #50

Why do these people look and talk so stiff in the video?

Dario is standing behind the camera with a gun in his hand.

Dario better get the PR out of this investment and everyone involved is in bodily distress
Post reply on HN