41–50 of 103 posts
"Their old testing tool, Enzyme, had fallen out of active maintenance and was becoming a blocker to modernizing Asana’s frontend stack" Non prod code, good use case.
Hopefully a human did give a quick look to make sure it didn’t just delete the tests.
The headlines feel similar
It is a good PR for Asana. I checked this with Gemini & here is what Gemini said - https://share.gemini.google/B8nocObwgiih Summary: The Takeaway Did an AI generate 5 years' worth of highly creative, novel software features from scratch in two weeks? No. Did an AI complete 5 years' worth of tedious, widespread code-migration technical debt in two weeks? Yes.
[flagged]
I think there might be a mixup here. You see: normally one reads for recreation or enlightenment. If that same one would approach their job as a recreational activity, or solely for enlightenment, you might not have that job for very long.
If you ask Sol or Claude how much time it will take to implement a plan they just came up with, they usually advise a timeframe in the weeks or months - assuming, I suppose, that human programmers will be building it. And then you ask the model to just "do it" and it takes an hour or two. I always find this entertaining.
If you ask Sol or Claude how much time it will take to implement a plan they just came up with, they usually advise a timeframe in the weeks or months - assuming, I suppose, that human programmers will be building it. And then you ask the model to just "do it" and it takes an hour or two. I always find this entertaining.
It's like every time they make a plan, there's something about things taking "a week or two", "month of focused work", or whatever.
This is something that would've been RL'd out a long time ago if it wasn't great for business.
[flagged]
I think there might be a mixup here. You see: normally one reads for recreation or enlightenment. If that same one would approach their job as a recreational activity, or solely for enlightenment, you might not have that job for very long.