Earlier quoted context omitted.
Americans. The U.S. has a lot of people who are unaccustomed to 24 hour time.
I knew for the imperial units but not this. This country ... let's say it always amaze me.
Casio F-B100W-1A
211–220 of 407 posts
Re: Casio F-B100W-1A
#212Earlier quoted context omitted.
To add to it, I always kept the manuals around, because remembering the key press sequences was akin to doing combos in arcade fighting games. A few months without doing them, and it was hopeless trying to remember how to do them again.
I have a 6.30AM alarm on my FW-91, and I'm too lazy to figure out how to switch it off. 15 beeps, btw, till it turns itself off for the day.
Press MODE, then press ALARM ON/OFF.
Re: Casio F-B100W-1A
#213Casio has been leaving a lot of money on the table in terms of nostalgia products. There's been a low rumble of demand for the Casio CZ series of synthesizers for a decade or more, and a bunch of non-Casio companies have cashed in on it (Behringer makes CZ-1 Mini, Arturia has CZ V, several other phase distortion synths exist). It's incredibly cheap to replicate, a simple early digital synthesis algorithm that'll run…
The expensive part of a modern synth isn't the DSP board, it's the industrial design and tooling needed to build the rest of the hardware.
The CZ series was workable, but there really aren't many passionate nostalgic buyers waiting to drop a few hundred - minimum - on an expensive reissue.
Re: Casio F-B100W-1A
#214BIG Warning to anyone thinking about purchasing one of these You cannot connect the watch to Bluetooth without a proprietary app, and that proprietary app will not let you use the Bluetooth feature without some bullshit called a "CASIO Account". Their privacy policy is a bit of an eyebrow-raiser too. The absolute state of things.
Isn't that common across all watches that connect to your phone these days? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Edit: Also, not saying it's a good thing.
Re: Casio F-B100W-1A
#215Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't that common across all watches that connect to your phone these days? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Edit: Also, not saying it's a good thing.
My bathroom scale requires gps access via my phone if I want to log data to it...
Re: Casio F-B100W-1A
#216Casio has been leaving a lot of money on the table in terms of nostalgia products. There's been a low rumble of demand for the Casio CZ series of synthesizers for a decade or more, and a bunch of non-Casio companies have cashed in on it (Behringer makes CZ-1 Mini, Arturia has CZ V, several other phase distortion synths exist). It's incredibly cheap to replicate, a simple early digital synthesis algorithm that'll run…
Re: Casio F-B100W-1A
#217BIG Warning to anyone thinking about purchasing one of these You cannot connect the watch to Bluetooth without a proprietary app, and that proprietary app will not let you use the Bluetooth feature without some bullshit called a "CASIO Account". Their privacy policy is a bit of an eyebrow-raiser too. The absolute state of things.
Isn't that common across all watches that connect to your phone these days? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Edit: Also, not saying it's a good thing.
Re: Casio F-B100W-1A
#218Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn't that common across all watches that connect to your phone these days? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Edit: Also, not saying it's a good thing.
My bathroom scale requires gps access via my phone if I want to log data to it...
What's not clear to me is why they really need to be able to scan for bluetooth. Surely requesting location permissions is worse UX than having the user go to the settings app to pair.
Re: Casio F-B100W-1A
#219One thing I've never understood (and hopefully some Casio geek can shine a light on): why do almost all old Casio models have a 24/12h time switch taking the premium spot as one of the main 4 buttons, instead of having it buried deep in the (awkward) menus. Seems to me that something like alarm or stopwatch setting or a second menu action button would have been far more useful.
Re: Casio F-B100W-1A
#220Casio has been leaving a lot of money on the table in terms of nostalgia products. There's been a low rumble of demand for the Casio CZ series of synthesizers for a decade or more, and a bunch of non-Casio companies have cashed in on it (Behringer makes CZ-1 Mini, Arturia has CZ V, several other phase distortion synths exist). It's incredibly cheap to replicate, a simple early digital synthesis algorithm that'll run…
Korg did it right - budget off-the-shelf processor, most of the money spent on the UI, wildly optimistic prices, no nostalgic ties. The expensive part of a modern synth isn't the DSP board, it's the industrial design and tooling needed to build the rest of the hardware. The CZ series was workable, but there really aren't many passionate nostalgic buyers waiting to drop a few hundred - minimum - on an expensive reissu…