141–149 of 149 posts
Monthly uptime: Claude API - 99.27% Claude Code - 99.16% Claude.ai - 99.14% At any large tech company these numbers would get entire teams of engineers fired. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been busy selling its “better than human engineers” AI while not managing to crack three 9s of availability.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>At any large tech company these numbers would get entire teams of engineers fired Is Github not a large tech company?
No, it is a platform owned and managed by Microsoft. Well, owned and mismanaged by Microsoft.
Between these ever more frequent disruptions and Opus 5's unbearable word soup I think Anthropic is more focused on massaging numbers and marketing to rush to IPO ahead of OpenAI than increasing user value. With Chinese competition just months behind them, they'd need to show a reasonable pathway to some kind of singularity event to justify whatever crazy valuation they intend to get. Because the recent products for…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
they unironically think that they can replace everyone in an organization
What I don't understand is, why not replace middle management, marketing, CTOs, CEOs and the like. Surely, LLMs are better at producing high quality looking slideware and vaporware than they are at producing software. Heavy sarcasm here if it's not obvious. Of course I know why.
Is the whole "it's gonna replace people" even still on the table?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What I don't understand is, why not replace middle management, marketing, CTOs, CEOs and the like. Surely, LLMs are better at producing high quality looking slideware and vaporware than they are at producing software. Heavy sarcasm here if it's not obvious. Of course I know why.
I mean, there a so many startups getting crazy funding that run without management, or without engineers... or at least with so many less people than before.. except: not really. Is the whole "it's gonna replace people" even still on the table?
Unfortunately, I don't think that's true.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I read everything. I will have AI ingest NDAs to make sure they arent glaringly weird and I then go read them, it gives me a good idea of what to look for.
It’s more that unwanted disclosure of sensitive business numbers is a product-class limitation at this time. While undoubtedly some models are better than others, expecting them not to leak information in high stakes output is unseasonable. Seems like you agree, since you are reading everything. Jumping to another company’s offering because of one instance doesn’t seem like that’s going to meaningfully change your ex…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I mean, there a so many startups getting crazy funding that run without management, or without engineers... or at least with so many less people than before.. except: not really. Is the whole "it's gonna replace people" even still on the table?
I don't really understand what you mean... are you saying that the entire industry is parroting a fantasy that they all know is fake. So, everyone is faking to get more funds? Unfortunately, I don't think that's true.
Do you see it already happening? I personally not. Lay offs are due to economic reasons, at least that's what I see. Why does Anthropic still had so many engineers?
I got the impression companies are already moving back from their initial excitement. Many went all-in AI "more is better", that's not the case anymore. Why restricting usage, it's much cheaper than paying an engineer.