Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

support.claude.com

231–240 of 275 posts

Re: Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

#231

For anyone on the fence, I was a hardcore CC user since it was released. I made the full switch to 5.6 sol and Codex about a month ago. It's the better experience. The limits are way higher (I almost never burn through my $200/m plan), and the output is better than Opus 4.8 (Opus 5 is completely unusable for me).

If you aren't using the full $200, you are losing money every month

What thought process gets you to that conclusion?

It's clearly not right if you compare it to API prices. It's even less right if you compare to a SWE salary.

Yes not using the full $200 means you aren't tokenmaxxing, but that seems about the most you can conclude from it.

Re: Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

#232

I've been watching this to see if they "extend" it again, let it end, or make it permanent. I'm regularly hitting 90-100% on my $200/mo sub and will switch to Codex in a heartbeat if they drop these limits. This constant uncertainty is really annoying.

From their Twitter:

"We hope to make this a permanent change to our plans, but strong demand for our models means that capacity may be tight over the coming weeks. We’ll keep you posted as things develop."

https://xcancel.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2089798442306711646

Re: Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

#233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> As it extrapolates the current financial information and performance there is an implied assumption that the present financial environment will not change significantly in the future.

Yes, but their "run rate" assumes the current level continues unchanged, right? If revenue per month goes down then the projected run rate is optimistic. However, revenue has been increasing, so the reported run rates have underestimated revenue. I think the better question is how much more than $65B/year revenue they need to cover what they are spending on capex and model development. I would bet money their revenue…

I think their capex will exceed their revenue, but $65B is a lot to spend on training runs!

I suspect it's more likely they will spend the extra money on hardware and infrastructure (data centers) either directly or via suppliers.

Re: Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

#234
post #79

I think the difference between the Anthropic token maximization approach (vibe code all the things!) and OpenAI's focus on efficiency, terseness and token reduction are going to be the defining features of who wins the long-term race. My money is on the more efficient solution. Even if Anthropic can win some benchmarks by using 3x tokens over 3x time, it is a terrible base to build toward the future. Users are no lon…

I really would like to see OpenAI’s focus on efficiency but everytime I use Codex, it wastes tokens like there’s no tomorrow, hitting week limit in a day, where I’m able to use Claude just fine. Maybe it’s based on the codebase, I don’t know, but I have better results with Claude than Codex.

Are you kidding me? OpenAI weekly limits feel _infinite_. I run out of Anthropic limits reliably halfway through the week

Re: Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

#235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not to sound like a mark, I try to not get attached to any of these providers. I've jumped between copilot, claude, gemini and chatgpt since the start of the year. chatgpt wasn't even worth looking at early this year. Anthropic has the smarter models for sure, and seems to be default in corporate. However, the amount of budget you get with GPT as a user is much better, the harness feels more polished, and the models…

> and it's likely producing better output to keep a human in the loop rather than trying to solve the world independently and making multiple incorrect assumptions. I was just discussing this with a co-worker yesterday. I would really like a model (or harness?) that worked with me instead of for me. Walk me through its choices and decisions, let me correct it and guide it along. I would be way more confident in it's…

the "grill" skill from matt pocock is quite nice for this

Re: Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

#236
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You've articulated what I found unsettling about Boris' pov that "coding is a solved problem". I listened to a few of his talks and was instinctively off-put by that sentiment. I figured a fellow programmer would understand and speak on the nuances. Granted it did make me think about my biases and to lean into more future facing inevitabilities. But you've nailed it, for Boris and Anthropic, they are betting that cod…

On the one hand it feels true. On the other I ask - what good software have anthropic, or anyone else, produced that was fully vibed? As someone who does near 100% of my coding via LLM these days, i still find that for anything complex i am still looking at and thinking in terms of code. Im still quality checking and steering at some interval via code. And im still not sure how or whether i can replicate that level o…

You'll have to define "good" before you can expect quality responses.

Re: Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

#237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's what any harness could do. By itself it's not evidence of distillation. Just mentioning Deepseek in there is just fear mongering, again American exceptionalism, which creates the belief only the US has the right to own cutting edge technology. It's a disservice to the entire world, and china happens to be the only challenger to that belief. They surely also asked for tasks to avoid mentioning Trump's involveme…

One can, say, hate America and feel its lunch is about to be munched by China and still read: “These labs generated over 16 million exchanges with Claude through approximately 24,000 fraudulent accounts…” and think “oh, there’s alleged evidence of distillation“.

The source is just anthropic saying what they believe and not providing any evidence beyond what they say. No raw chat logs to analyze independently. That's American exceptionalism

Re: Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

#239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also try a hundred bucks on Openrouter and experiment with the Chinese models like Deepseek, Kimi, GLM. $100 will last a good while, and it isn't tied to a single model or provider.

I have the $100 plan on OpenCode Zen, which I imagine is similar. I burn through it ridiculously fast. I haven't run the numbers, but it felt about the same as an Anthropic $20 plan

Yeah. Same. Deepseek Flash goes a long way, but it’s not capable enough for many tasks, so I end up defaulting to my Codex sub and just use Sol.

Re: Claude Code May–August 2026 weekly limits promotion

#240

For anyone on the fence, I was a hardcore CC user since it was released. I made the full switch to 5.6 sol and Codex about a month ago. It's the better experience. The limits are way higher (I almost never burn through my $200/m plan), and the output is better than Opus 4.8 (Opus 5 is completely unusable for me).

I use Claude and Antigravity CLI as an (Arch) Linux desktop system administrator a lot lately. Is Codex useful for that too?

Not sure what Antigravity is, but Sol is good at sysadmin tasks.
Post reply on HN