Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

news.ycombinator.com

141–150 of 280 posts

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#141
post #8

Github is struggling because AI-boosted coding increased the number of commits 14x in the past year, and the pace is still accelerating. The site is struggling to keep up. Github's COO confirms it here: https://x.com/kdaigle/status/2040164759836778878 Platform activity is surging. There were 1 billion commits in 2025. As of three months ago, it was 275 million per week, on pace for 14 billion this year if growth rema…

The fools thought we needed data centers for agents, but we actually needed data centers for Github!

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#142

non-helpful answer: the "Microsoft Acquires GitHub" line in this graph answers all questions https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/

In all fairness, the features expanded substantially after the acquisition so there's are a lot more components that can experience downtime. Pre-acquisition, github was a fairly simple code repository with issues bolted on. Actions, Dependabot, Codespaces, Advanced Security, Package Registry, Copilot, etc. all came after the acquisition and probably involve much more overhead than what github was prior to the acquisition. It basically went from code hosting platform where machines are sitting idle when pushes and pulls aren't happening to a fully integrated developer ecosystem. Any one of those things experiencing degraded performance is going to show up on an uptime chart.

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#143
Github Status: Incident with GitHub.com

Aug 17, 21:15 UTC Resolved - On August 17, 2026, from 13:28–21:15 UTC (7h 47m),

GitHub.com experienced elevated errors and latency across Issues, Pull Requests, APIs, Actions, and Copilot. At peak, web/API error rates were approximately 20%, while archive and raw-content downloads reached approximately 50%. SAML/OIDC authentication, SCIM, and Team Sync were also affected, as well as Actions workflows in GHEC with Data Residency that depend on public workflow step definitions hosted on GitHub.com. Most services recovered by 16:36 UTC as our Central US datacenter recovered; Actions was degraded until approximately 18:03 UTC; and Copilot Token Service fully recovered by 21:02.

Some of the failing traffic was moved from Central US to Northern Virginia where it was served successfully until the network failure in Central US was debugged and resolved. Delayed replies to a single internal endpoint triggered a latent retry bug in VS Code that amplified traffic by approximately 10x and caused delayed recovery for the Copilot Token Service.

The immediate cause of the failure was network saturation on load balancers in Central US due to a new peak in traffic. Originally this was caused by an Istio sidecar pod reaching its concurrency limits and failing to auto scale correctly because of a misconfigured policy that watched host service but not sidecar limits. One failure cascaded to more and eventually four HAProxy nodes exhausted their flow limits, degrading the gateway auth path and causing widespread authentication latency and failures. The problem was worsened by optimistic retry logic which overloaded internal load balancers. Pausing HAProxy on those nodes simultaneously produced immediate broad recovery. The retry storm in Northern VA was fixed by 1) temporarily reducing gateway retry logic with a PR and 2) blocking inbound Copilot Token Service token requests at the load balancers with a 403, and then gradually ramping back up traffic per-site to allow callers to succeed. Residual Copilot authentication failures continued because client retry behavior amplified load: a failed token operation could generate many extra requests and enter a retry loop. Copilot Token Service traffic increased from a normal 7–9K RPS to 70–100K RPS. Reducing gateway authentication retries and blocking retry-triggering responses stabilized Copilot Token Service and completed recovery.

Complicating factors that impeded recovery included a number of scraping attacks on codeload endpoints.

To prevent recurrence, our follow-up actions include:

- Correcting autoscaling policies to account for service-mesh sidecar concurrency and capacity.

- Auditing Istio request, concurrency, and scaling limits across affected services.

- Reviewing retry limits and backoff behavior across gateways and clients.

- Addressing the VS Code retry behavior that amplified Copilot token traffic.

So basically bad code pushes that caused request amplification and then huge gaps in operational scaling and reliability standards. Oof.

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#144

non-helpful answer: the "Microsoft Acquires GitHub" line in this graph answers all questions https://damrnelson.github.io/github-historical-uptime/

To be fair, before the aquisition, GitHub was super stable, but also it felt like they rarely changed or added anything. After Microsoft acquired them, they started rolling out new features at an incredible pace. And if you look at the breakdown of the downtime, most of the downtime is in features that didn't exist before the acquisition. Though not all of the downtime is in new features. The core is also less stable…

But I just want stable hosting for my shit. I barely even interact with the web UI, other than commenting on PRs.

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#145
post #60

I got an "it is unacceptable" from their CPO on 8/7, and that they are "working around the clock on it". https://x.com/mariorod1/status/2085800861469495465 I really think something deeper is going wrong there, and they're not being honest with their paying customers (and enterprises) about it.

I mean they may be working around the clock, but after 5 or 6 layoffs in 3 years… half their engineers are probably still learning the code base.

Yeah, and the rest are probably not quite so invested.

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#146
post #5

Many microsoft services are down/failing today, including sites hosted on Azure. I'm guessing it's a larger MS outage.

So perhaps we should be asking Azure engineers, not Guthub engineers?

GutHub, a SaaS for tracking your gut microbiome

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#147
post #20
post #8

Github is struggling because AI-boosted coding increased the number of commits 14x in the past year, and the pace is still accelerating. The site is struggling to keep up. Github's COO confirms it here: https://x.com/kdaigle/status/2040164759836778878 Platform activity is surging. There were 1 billion commits in 2025. As of three months ago, it was 275 million per week, on pace for 14 billion this year if growth rema…

The obvious answer is to end free unlimited private repos. Source is no longer a specific thing. GitHub is just a free S3 or Azure provider.

A lot of private repos are probably just taking up cheap storage space, not seeing activity that would cause additional load.

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#148
post #98
post #8

Github is struggling because AI-boosted coding increased the number of commits 14x in the past year, and the pace is still accelerating. The site is struggling to keep up. Github's COO confirms it here: https://x.com/kdaigle/status/2040164759836778878 Platform activity is surging. There were 1 billion commits in 2025. As of three months ago, it was 275 million per week, on pace for 14 billion this year if growth rema…

I'm curios what is the bottleneck then? Because github(ms) has enough resources to hire competent people and provision needed hw to solve scaling the issues.

Looking at the design of Github Actions, I don't see any competency.

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#149
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I would take what C-level execs say with a grain of salt. 100% agree. > Remember these folks hire people with plenty of system design experience. Not my overall experience 30 years in the industry. > They likely also have the money for hardware resources. You'll always be asked to do more with less, at least, that's my own experience.

Also my experience

Also my experience

Re: Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?

#150
post #8

Github is struggling because AI-boosted coding increased the number of commits 14x in the past year, and the pace is still accelerating. The site is struggling to keep up. Github's COO confirms it here: https://x.com/kdaigle/status/2040164759836778878 Platform activity is surging. There were 1 billion commits in 2025. As of three months ago, it was 275 million per week, on pace for 14 billion this year if growth rema…

My sense is that a lot of this activity isn't even legitimate use. As one example: my company has a GitHub app, and last night some bot added my app to 1700 repos. Then the bot immediately started rapid-firing commits which each affected hundreds of files, triggering a deluge of GitHub webhooks to my servers. The repo names all matched other GitHub apps, so my sense is this bot had added 1700 GitHub apps to 1700 repo…

The GitHub bot situation is so frustrating! A good ~50% of community traffic on our repos is spam and bots and to report them I have to fill out a lengthy form and MAYBE GitHub will ban them six weeks later. And I also can't tell whether our repos are being used (and thus worth investing in): GitHib only shows two weeks of traffic data and what they do have is completely useless because they can't filter out bot traffic.
Post reply on HN