English too difficult for you, Dario?
Degraded performance for multiple models
51–60 of 149 posts
Re: Degraded performance for multiple models
#52Despite the years-long moaning on HN about AWS US East being a single point of failure, we've sold our souls to yet another unstable monolith.
Re: Degraded performance for multiple models
#53Anthropic had really screwed up after 4.6. i don't know if they work to satisfy their ego or for releasing a better model for tasks.
I wonder if from now on we have to switch providers every six months or so.
Re: Degraded performance for multiple models
#54Mondays are for GitHub, Tuesdays are for Anthropic
They actually also had some issues yesterday: https://status.claude.com/incidents/zhk4v3yv1lsf
Re: Degraded performance for multiple models
#55I still believe Claude has a better UI/UX in the web interface, but tolerating Anthropic's bullshit is not worth it.
Re: Degraded performance for multiple models
#56Anthropic had really screwed up after 4.6. i don't know if they work to satisfy their ego or for releasing a better model for tasks.
Just recently went back to ChatGPT after abandoning it for Claude. I must say I was stunned at how good it had become and also how they introduced new product features that I really liked. I wonder if from now on we have to switch providers every six months or so.
Re: Degraded performance for multiple models
#57Mondays are for GitHub, Tuesdays are for Anthropic
Re: Degraded performance for multiple models
#58The only issue with relying on local models is when you need them to prompt other models, and you might need to offload or switch models constantly which adds significant overhead.
But when it all works, its truly awe inspiring.