Live data from Hacker News

How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

timmarinin.net

411–420 of 478 posts

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#411

Nobody in the comments talking about snapchat where like one of the core pillars of what "sets their service apart" is the difficulty of taking a screenshot without notifying the other party

Snapchat is just on another level when it comes to screenshots.

"Forget watermarks, I'm just going to let the person know! Ha!"

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#412
post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve seen another app do that but for a different reason. It’s for security cameras and they use it to show a “hey idiot just press the save a picture button, don’t take screenshots” popup, which is also hostile. I’m not sure why the app needs to be notified. There must be some use but I can’t think of it off the top of my head.

Yeah it’s Snapchat. If you take a screenshot of a (potentially extremely private, intended to be ephemeral) image, it notifies the person who sent it.

Actually I was referring to the Eufy app. How nice there are others.

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#413
post #197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve seen another app do that but for a different reason. It’s for security cameras and they use it to show a “hey idiot just press the save a picture button, don’t take screenshots” popup, which is also hostile. I’m not sure why the app needs to be notified. There must be some use but I can’t think of it off the top of my head.

> I’m not sure why the app needs to be notified. There must be some use but I can’t think of it off the top of my head. My pet theory: it's because Snapchat got big early, platforms added the feature to facilitate Snapchat's business model, and then banks started abusing it, and it stuck around "because sekhurity".

No, that feature long predates Snapchat. In fact, I think it predates iOS, but I don’t remember for sure.

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#414
post #339
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This exists for a very good reason. It’s so if an app is showing a password or bank account number or other piece of sensitive information it doesn’t accidentally end up in a screenshot. I think there are other places sensitive information won’t show. Bluesky, and apparently others, are abusing the functionality for advertising purposes. I think it’s a good thing it’s there. This functionality should be easy for apps…

> it doesn’t accidentally end up in a screenshot Your banking app probably has an option to disable that because it's a legal requirement in so many places: People who can't see need to use assistive tools, and that includes screenshots and friends. If you are using a tiny/stupid bank in the US, file a ADA claim and get some money. In the EU check your Ombudsman. No, it's so you can't screen-record Netflix. The bank…

iOS and MacOS have a large number of built-in accessibility features. Taking a screenshot of the screen is not necessary.

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#415
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This exists for a very good reason. It’s so if an app is showing a password or bank account number or other piece of sensitive information it doesn’t accidentally end up in a screenshot. I think there are other places sensitive information won’t show. Bluesky, and apparently others, are abusing the functionality for advertising purposes. I think it’s a good thing it’s there. This functionality should be easy for apps…

"accidentally end up in a screenshot" --- how often do you even take a screenshot on a phone, much less accidentally?

I believe Apple added an entire section to the photos app to show screenshots that were taken.

I don’t accidentally take screenshots very often, though it does happen.

I know multiple people who seem to take them constantly. It’s crazy. You and I may not do it, but I promise you there are people who do. LOTS of them.

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#416
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This exists for a very good reason. It’s so if an app is showing a password or bank account number or other piece of sensitive information it doesn’t accidentally end up in a screenshot. I think there are other places sensitive information won’t show. Bluesky, and apparently others, are abusing the functionality for advertising purposes. I think it’s a good thing it’s there. This functionality should be easy for apps…

If a dev forgot to obfuscate the password and rendered it as plain text on the screen, then what are the chances they remember to program the blur into this screenshot api hook. Or why not add an alert, “what me to blur sensitive info? Yes/No”

Doing it correctly requires setting a single Boolean. That’s it. The OS will do everything else for you if you don’t override it.

There’s no need to implement a custom blur.

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#417
post #49

If it's between this and a perpetual logo, I'll take this any day. I actually really like this approach. The action button isn't relevant in this context, and it doesn't occlude the content. There's certainly situations where you wouldn't want this (ie if you're developing the app and you want to redesign starting from a screenshot), but for the average user I think this isn't overly hostile. I understand that people…

I actually hate that apps are allowed to blank out content on screenshots, and this can't be disabled. There are apps completely mis-using it, e.g. mobile payment apps which hardly show any sensitive data in most cases, but now I can't share e.g. infos on screen with someone else easily. It's a classic case of someone discovering a feature and thinking "hell yeah, so much security" without understanding or caring abo…

The use case they have in mind may be screenshots triggered by another app, not by the user.

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#418
post #347

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really glad open-source password managers are resisting the bullying and not implementing DRM.

For now: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/10406 Or not: https://github.com/Kunzisoft/KeePassDX/issues/2321 They are imo clearly gearing up to lock down passkeys in practice one day so that you will only be able to use those tied to a Google or Apple account (or some new player). They're already threatening in these issues to blacklist open implementations that don't submit to their requirements, and…

>Or not: https://github.com/Kunzisoft/KeePassDX/issues/2321

...and it characteristic the level of patronising arrogance in the issue thread

"This is normal. It is not recommended to copy passwords to the clipboard in any case, this mitigates this behavior and complies with new Web Authentication standards."

This does not even invite a discussion. Maybe some people run tight, safe systems and know what they are doing? Maybe some people never rely on a single password being the only thing between them an an account compromise? Nope. Some patronising guy knows it all, and will override what people want to do on their machines.

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#419

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The number of times I've seen people blow though prompts which directly refer to the issue they are coming to me about... SMH

Trained by the many more prompts that are irrelevant in practice, and merely stand between a person and the task they're trying to accomplish. It's not like computers give people a good reason to read the error popups. 90% of them these days are just "oops, computer pooped itself, a well trained army of monkeys is on its way to clean it up; try again later 0xbunchofbullshit-hexadecimal-uuids-for-vendor-telemetry ;-)"…

I'd say the problem is that delete usually has a popup. Sure you don't really want to delete without any kind of confirmation, way too many people would click something on accident and if there's not a way to undo it (which has it's own issues), then a popup is a simple solution, but it does result in this unfortunate behavior.

Re: How Bluesky draws its logo on screenshots

#420
The overall sentiment is that everyone is okay with Bluesky adding a watermark while a few days ago they were up in arms about Claude adding a watermark?

It seems more appropriate for Claude to do it seeing as it generated the image, all Bluesky did is provide the platform to post it.

Post reply on HN