Live data from Hacker News

old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 78 posts

Re: old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

#51
Still cannot duplicate here. Only a 'network security has blocked you' deterent screen that goes away on refresh then old.reddit works fine. Not a uniform change for everyone it seems. Can also log in if an actual user and set preference to old.

https://old.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/1ujtebf/logging_in...

Re: old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

#52
I can trigger the login redirect with /s/ in the URL

Otherwise I can still access Reddit without an account, e.g., /r/... and /r/.../comments/...

It seems the company still has not fully implemented this change

The notice suggests it should already be completed by now, but it isn't

Re: old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

#53
old.reddit.com is remnants of a product they're trying to distance themselves from. People who like it are not the target market. It's not that they want you to go away, they'd much rather you be a scroll zombie addicted to the tripe on the front page. But if that's not an option they'd rather you fuck off. All the thoughtful subreddits I used to visit are ghost towns now, with 1-4 posts a month.

Re: old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lemmy (part of of fediverse), HN, Tildes, Lobste.rs.

i liked lemmy but was put off by how mixed the quality was, and how many random images seemed to link to dubious image repos or otherwise set off malware alarms. reddits heavy monetization means they at least try to keep out a majority of the bad actors but lemmy always seemed a wild west. perhaps i will revisit soon.

Strange... I don't ever recall ever coming across an image linking somewhere outside of lemmy. Most people just upload images directly into their instance when creating posts.

In general never felt like I saw some dodgy link or anything nefarious

Re: old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

#55
post #14

Are there any decent alternatives to reddit? When they finish killing off old reddit I'm gone, and will need a new time waster.

Lemmy (part of of fediverse), HN, Tildes, Lobste.rs.

Lobste.rs deliberately blocks Brave due to the maintainers having ingested all the FUD.

Re: old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

#56
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What did they do with i.reddit.com? That still works for me too as far as I know. But as long as I remember, it's needed some awful looking session identifier.

It cannot be possible. i.reddit.com is 301 permanently moved to www.reddit.com

Hmm maybe I meant i.redd.it .

Re: old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

#58

old.reddit.com is remnants of a product they're trying to distance themselves from. People who like it are not the target market. It's not that they want you to go away, they'd much rather you be a scroll zombie addicted to the tripe on the front page. But if that's not an option they'd rather you fuck off. All the thoughtful subreddits I used to visit are ghost towns now, with 1-4 posts a month.

they did ban a ton of people in large purges last year, they lost all those users that couldve generated content and now its filled with bots/Ai posts.

Re: old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

#59

I noticed that too... There are still ways around it, but I don't think it'll last long. I don't know, I'm thinking of giving up on Reddit altogether

reddit is already blocking other methods to remove the login popup, they arnt rolling it out all at once for fear of public backlash. they are trying to sneak it in slowly.

Re: old.reddit.com Now Requires a Login

#60
post #20

I've seen many people point out that, despite AI being heralded as increasing engineering productivity by 10x or more, we don't seem to have gotten a decade worth of new disruptive sites and apps like we got multiple times a year in the early 2010s. Not that surprising to me, as product fit was always the bottleneck, rarely engineering. But I can say that where AI and its externalities truly excel and have rapidly ac…

Last year they purged so many accounts and lost a ton of users, and now its full of AI bot slop accounts. I think the forced login is a way to bring back that engagement? Also i noticed they today hid comments behind"login to see the conversation on a mobile browser.

The AI moderation is completely out of control. They'll permaban 15 year old accounts for chatting about WW2 history because they used phrases like " should have killed when they had a chance, and we paid for it as a result". I got an account suspended for a week for a (positive, happy tone) joke that had nothing to do with violence or aggression, think "Hell yeah bro, go for it!" A human confirmed it, which makes me think, assuming it is a human, that the human just mashes buttons to reach KPI requirements.

>I think the forced login is a way to bring back that engagement?

I just don't see it when they've decided that (a) bans, sometimes perma bans, are the solution to any (often hallucinated) misbehavior and that (b) the new user experience is to be as terrible as possible in as obtuse a way as possible.

It really seems like they're going hard for ragebait as their main driver of engagement. AITA, GirlDinnerDiaries, etc. Reddit is where your average oversocialized office worker with a boring life goes to read about peoples' drama and problems. The Jerry Springer show for millennials.

Post reply on HN