Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Incident with Github.com [resolved]

githubstatus.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

511–520 of 1001 posts

Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]

#512

Post by teddyh »

smcameron wrote: post #444

I wonder if you could replace the whole github issues feature with just a directory within each git repo named "Issues/". Within that, have another couple directories, "open/", and "closed/". Within "open", have a directory per issue, e.g. "such-and-such-does-not-work/". Within each issue directory, have "issue.txt", or "issue.md", which takes the place of the page for each issue on github. You could store other thin…

Undoubtedly: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22833037>

Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]

#513

Post by pelorat »

OtomotO wrote: post #255
duxup wrote: post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And like Twitter most people will keep using it anyway?

Just in the US. I have ONE European client... ONE of dozens who use GitHub. EVERY other client I've ever worked with used their own gitforge or at least bitbucket...

Github pricing is aimed at US companies. Small EU companies that can only afford to pay their 5-6 developers 60K euro per year rather selfhost than pay GitHub.

Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]

#514

Post by hackertyper69 »

ryuuseijin wrote: post #461
klaussilveira wrote: post #456

I encourage everyone to switch to Forgejo. We ditched GitHub and could not be happier. The experience is smoother, faster and distraction-free. Our runners are faster, our CI is smoother than ever. Transitioning was a matter of a few hours, which we took as a fun hackaton.

Just going to leave this here - self hosted forgejo on fly.io with restic backups: https://forgejo-fly.fly.dev/forgejo-admin/forgejo-fly

What is fly for?

Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]

#516

Post by let_rec »

standwportugul wrote: post #323
MallocVoidstar wrote: post #309

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GitHub's historical uptime page is fake, they backfilled it with 100% uptime going back to 1996: https://www.githubstatus.com/uptime?page=200

seems to be correct. there's no record of the outage on 8/13 :/

HN is likely a better source than GH status...

Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]

#517

Post by gortok »

So how’s using Azure to power GitHub going?

Seriously. It seems like there’s an issue every other week. It would historically be normal to provide post mortems, and maybe I’ve missed them but seems like there are almost weekly issues and no follow up into the core reasons why.

Post reply on HN