Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Desktopcolors.com – A museum for solid background colors of classic OS

desktopcolors.com

31–40 of 77 posts

Re: Show HN: Desktopcolors.com – A museum for solid background colors of classic OS

#33

When I was just getting into Linux and trying out all the random window managers, I found that I really liked the hues of green and purple that Blackbox came with.

I agree, Blackbox is still one of the WMs on my wishlist.

Re: Show HN: Desktopcolors.com – A museum for solid background colors of classic OS

#34
post #5

One nerdy detail about old operating systems and graphics cards: due to the way the VGA color palette works, the teal background used in Windows 98 and earlier versions of Windows was actually lighter than #008080 if the computer was configured to use 16 colors (not 256 colors): https://twitter.com/bakertechsrvcs/status/162629846037367193... https://xcancel.com/bakertechsrvcs/status/162629846037367193... Another nerd…

I always liked the feeling of getting a proper video driver installed and unlocking "true color" support, the desktop background and icons were suddenly much richer and saturated.

Re: Show HN: Desktopcolors.com – A museum for solid background colors of classic OS

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seconded. The "personality" it tries to add is trite and tiresome and everybody immediately sees it for what it is, especially for a case like this where there's only so many ways to say "this is the default desktop color of an operating system." Not only that, but it's confusing - is "Windows Classic blue" a real thing, or just an attempt at a cute phrase? Just label the colors and be done with it.

It's actually not so easy to pick a speaking name for each color, since many colors are used in different OSs. I tried to use neutral and standard color names were they exist. Things like Windows Classic blue are probably always description-slop, though. Another user suggested to use media quotes etc. on OSs, which I think is actually a pretty good idea. I might swap the LLM generated placeholders for something like…

Why do you even need the text? Just show the color, year and the name of the OS.

Re: Show HN: Desktopcolors.com – A museum for solid background colors of classic OS

#38
The descriptions under the colors are very obviously LLM generated and make little sense. No human would make statements like what is written under each entry. Contains many LLM-isms like em-dashes, loaded words, and load-bearing phrases (emphasis intended). Consider removing or rewriting those bits.

Re: Show HN: Desktopcolors.com – A museum for solid background colors of classic OS

#39

When I was just getting into Linux and trying out all the random window managers, I found that I really liked the hues of green and purple that Blackbox came with.

Update: I went into the source code and found the colors I was fond of. I didn't care for the red but I'm including it for completeness

Grey: #aaaaaa Green: #77aa77 Purple: #9077aa Blue: #7790aa Red: #aa5555

Source: https://github.com/bradleythughes/blackbox/tree/master/data/...

Re: Show HN: Desktopcolors.com – A museum for solid background colors of classic OS

#40

Huh, I do not remember Windows 1.0 being that shade of green but screenshots confirm what's here.

Interestingly, none of the screenshots I can find show the dithering that the article talks about, and all the contemporary photographs of monitors show a less green blue background. I think maybe something is being lost in emulation?
Post reply on HN