[flagged]
I object to the notion that having "american born engineers" is the cause of their issues.
Incident with Github.com [resolved]
111–120 of 1001 posts
Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]
#112We're starting to have the conversation of "do we need to replace GitHub as our CI/CD pipeline?" No idea if/when we decide to pull that bandaid but I think once we can't merge a hot fix into main because of GH being down, it'll be a big org push to replace it. What's everyone else using? Self hosted Gitlab? Gitea?
Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]
#113[flagged]
First of all, I highly doubt it. Second, how would you even know that?
Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]
#114I had a lot of goodwill for GitHub but I think today is the tipping point. Looking at a unicorn page, I feel this lingering hope that it's transient (like it usually was in the old days) but my mind reassures me it's probably going to be a long full outage again. The hope is dead.
I’m willing to give them a break as I’m assuming they have a lot of scaling problems due to the influx of LLM assisted coding. But maybe I’m wrong?
Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]
#115So whats the alternative? I'm thinking I'll migrate my company to something self hosted, but what about personal projects?
Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]
#116[flagged]
The UX is so bad. Things don't work as expected. Even basic things like composing an email, copy and pasting, formatting text are always a chore.
Try setting up a Teams integration vs a Slack integration. Gmail is absolutely light years ahead in UX. I really miss working at a company that uses Slack + Google Suites.
Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]
#117If you are required to use a Microsoft tool is Azure DevOps now a better choice? Our Azure hosted instance rarely (if ever) has had an outage that effects our ability to work.
Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]
#118> We are seeing an approximate 20% error rate across numerous experiences including Pull Requests, Issues, and others. Investigations are currently under way and we will be posting updates as they become available Well it's 100% down for me, so does this mean 20% of all users are fully down?
It means it doesn't count towards their uptime at all, I guess, because all their uptime stats are very high for a service that is down more than anything else I use
> Posted 1 minute ago. Aug 17, 2026 - 13:58 UTC
It also took them 20 minutes to realize that peoples requests to /pull/xx are not working :D
Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
Copy/paste of a comment I posted a couple months ago: I am not trying to make any excuses for GitHub, however I recall one tweet that made my eyes bug-out: > Yup, platform activity is surging. There were 1 billion commits in 2025. Now, it's 275 million per week, on pace for 14 billion this year if growth remains linear (spoiler: it won't.) > GitHub Actions has grown from 500M minutes/week in 2023 to 1B minutes/week i…
That's fine, but rate limiting is a solved problem at this point. They need to rate-limit free accounts and be realistic about their limits instead of letting the system fail.
Re: Incident with Github.com [resolved]
#120[flagged]
I object to the notion that having "american born engineers" is the cause of their issues.