Live data from Hacker News

At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

smithsonianmag.com

131–140 of 140 posts

Re: At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

#131
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A problem with vaccines and the public is that when you perform any intervention on many many people, some will happen to (randomly) suffer some issue. To them, it is obviously causation, regardless of what the math (that they do t understand) says.

A further problem is that vaccines generally aren't perfect, some people do get sick. Some people may even die. It's a population-based approach. They save far-far more people. Unfortunately vaccine-denialists will say 'ah this person died from getting a vaccine, we shouldn't vaccinate anyone'. Even if the vaccine saves millions of lives.

People who volunteer for a new vaccine can't exactly be called vaccine denialists. I guess the prospect of a Lyme vaccine would appeal a little more to hypochondriacs, but isn't it also possible that this vaccine sometimes triggered whatever autoimmune issues which Lyme possibly triggers? I don't want to dismiss everyone who claims long-term effects after a Lyme infection.

Re: At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

#133
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And tick-borne encephalitis, in regions where that is endemic. No need to be rude, though!

Being rude to people spreading dangerous misinformation is mandatory on the internet, lima. Do you kindly and charitably respond to antivaxxers and drug dealers?

HN has very specific rules for this: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

You don't respond to them at all, flag the comment, and/or email the moderators.

Being snarky does not contribute to the discussion and gets your comments flagged.

Re: At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

#134
post #129
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

how about Lucira?

Neat, I hadn't seen those until now. I saw the kits were used for COVID, I wonder if they have a licensing platform to extend it to other tests. And I wonder what it takes to make the unit re-usable with a new test. Would be a cool project for bunnie to dismantle.

Be careful with the dismantling, if it's a used test, you will likely end up with DNA amplicon contamination which is extremely hard to get rid of.

Re: At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

#135
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ticks do not drop from trees.

On the Elizabeth Islands at Cape Cod MA we have huge numbers of ticks and all the allergies and illnesses that go along with them. We also have no pavement or vehicles so we are into tick habitat as soon as we step out the door. To defend ourselves we have developed an oversock to stop ticks on the foot and lower leg where they often hop on. We chose a tight-weave parachute fabric so that even the tiniest ticks can't…

TIL about Ticktogs. Thanks!

Re: At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where is your proof? They have thermal sensors on their forearms and are known to climb trees. Why wouldn't they approach from above?

https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/about/index.html https://projectlyme.org/ticks-debunking-common-myths-and-mis...

Could you share the paper where every tick species was tested over a decade and none of them ever climbed up a tree and fell down on prey?

Re: At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

#137
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Being rude to people spreading dangerous misinformation is mandatory on the internet, lima. Do you kindly and charitably respond to antivaxxers and drug dealers?

HN has very specific rules for this: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html You don't respond to them at all, flag the comment, and/or email the moderators. Being snarky does not contribute to the discussion and gets your comments flagged.

So you (high karma user) are recommending that I (low karma user) simply flag (which I can't do) and not respond (leaving no trace) to misinformation?

I should respond to bad info by continuing to lurk. Very smart!

Re: At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

#138
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

HN has very specific rules for this: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html You don't respond to them at all, flag the comment, and/or email the moderators. Being snarky does not contribute to the discussion and gets your comments flagged.

So you (high karma user) are recommending that I (low karma user) simply flag (which I can't do) and not respond (leaving no trace) to misinformation? I should respond to bad info by continuing to lurk. Very smart!

Yes, if you're unable to be polite about it, just don't comment and/or email the moderators. Your comment would have been informative and well-received without the snark.

You were right to call out the other person for trivializing the risks of tick bites, just assume good faith and be kind.

Re: At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

#139
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you (high karma user) are recommending that I (low karma user) simply flag (which I can't do) and not respond (leaving no trace) to misinformation? I should respond to bad info by continuing to lurk. Very smart!

Yes, if you're unable to be polite about it, just don't comment and/or email the moderators. Your comment would have been informative and well-received without the snark. You were right to call out the other person for trivializing the risks of tick bites, just assume good faith and be kind.

[deleted]

Re: At-home test for infected ticks could improve Lyme Disease diagnosis

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

for lyme disease? Can you share which? I believe in my country this is treated differently...

The prophylactic treatment for potential exposure to Lyme is a single dose of doxycycline within 72 hours of being bitten: https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/resources/pdfs/lyme-pep-low-ink-p.p... If you catch it early before it takes hold, the treatment is almost inconsequential. If you delay, it's up to a 4 week course of antibiotics.

Thanks! That's quite important information worth saving
Post reply on HN