In what context would generating code faster not be a desired outcome? Assuming of course everything else stays the same (quality, etc.)
Kinda begging the question, aren't we here?
121–130 of 136 posts
In what context would generating code faster not be a desired outcome? Assuming of course everything else stays the same (quality, etc.)
Kinda begging the question, aren't we here?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree. Personally, I would work in company which respects more code/infra quality than coding speed. When you vibe-deliver a lot of features per sprint after some time codebase becomes an unpredictable AI Slop.
> I would work in company which respects more code/infra quality than coding speed Same. But that doesn’t have to be in contrast to using AI tools. There’s a lot of grunt in day to day coding as well. The problem is not the tools
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would. Just finished up a job search recently for staff+, and still got leetcode interviews for most companies.
Thanks. That's tough. Did you only interview at big tech?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Someone answered the question with some actual examples. Please refrain from the hyperbole
Exactly. It's quite scary that some people are reacting viciously to this type of question. There's real insecurity here...
Stepping back from AI completely (vs changing how AI is used in the company) is like stopping using IDEs, compilers etc. It's a tool . I don't understand why people would even entertain that. They are completely fine using random libraries written by random people but not having AI helping with a small refactoring? Nobody is making you use AI to do the entire work . I see developers using languages with garbage colle…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks. That's tough. Did you only interview at big tech?
Big, medium, and startups. Big and medium definitely biased more towards leetcode, but I also got it at around a quarter of startups I applied to.
Good luck to you!