Absolutely hugged to death.
Archived copy: https://web.archive.org/web/20260816073823/https://rvembedde...
A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”
21–30 of 350 posts
Re: A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”
#22https://rvembedded.com/products/project-lab/
Definitely interested!
Re: A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Non-American here... what is DACH?
It is Germany, Austria, Switzerland.
Re: A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”
#24Nice read! Though it feels a bit strange that "I have exceeded the allowed number of requests. (500 times)" when I first clicked the article and I'm pretty sure I don't share the ip of my self-hosted VPN with anyone.
Re: A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”
#25I love the article, it's a breath of fresh air compared to the usual bay area centric takes. However there's just one issue: > The students I want to teach are in the same position, and so are the ones in Nigeria and Bangladesh It does not take $60 to ship small sub $1 chips from Asia to Nigeria/Bangladesh. These two countries are all on global trade routes (both supply and demand) and the expensive last mile deliver…
> it's a breath of fresh air compared to the usual bay area centric takes... HN hasn't been Bay Area centric in years. Honestly, most comments and usership on the platform seems to now align with SWE culture in DACH and CEE. Presumed RISC-V hate is a perfect example of that - the UCs and CSUs have been using RISC-V in their curriculum since the 2010s becuase Patterson is faculty at Cal and most CompArch courses in bo…
fwiw, my experience is similar. hn has not been about startups, vc funding, or anything in that space for quite a while.
to paraphrase a classic, this place is like a memory of the forum we used to love, and the memory is fading.
Re: A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”
#26I love the article, it's a breath of fresh air compared to the usual bay area centric takes. However there's just one issue: > The students I want to teach are in the same position, and so are the ones in Nigeria and Bangladesh It does not take $60 to ship small sub $1 chips from Asia to Nigeria/Bangladesh. These two countries are all on global trade routes (both supply and demand) and the expensive last mile deliver…
Bangladesh is a country in Asia...
Re: A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
> it's a breath of fresh air compared to the usual bay area centric takes... HN hasn't been Bay Area centric in years. Honestly, most comments and usership on the platform seems to now align with SWE culture in DACH and CEE. Presumed RISC-V hate is a perfect example of that - the UCs and CSUs have been using RISC-V in their curriculum since the 2010s becuase Patterson is faculty at Cal and most CompArch courses in bo…
>HN hasn't been Bay Area centric in years. Honestly, most comments and usership on the platform seems to now align with DACH. I honestly do not get this at all. HN remains very US-centric to me, and especially centric to the mindshare of the Bay Area's IRL conversations, and apart from some takes on tech rights, does not really remind me of my experience in DACH.
>> HN remains very US-centric
Bay Area != US
The Bay Area is its own microcosm of culture and philosophy that diverges significantly from much of the US.
Not making a statement on how prevalent either are on HN, but Bay Area is very much not equivalent to the US.
Re: A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”
#28Re: A third world engineer responds to “RISC-V: They should have known better”
#29Does anyone have an archive?