Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
31–40 of 93 posts
Re: Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
#32I tried building something similar a few months ago. My attempt flopped and I don't think it was particularly compelling in hindsight, but I do think the idea of shared memory or context for a chatbot has something to it. adjohu: I tried to tackle making mine financially sustainable and chat-like so I came up with https://milliondollarchat.com which treats the context / memory as influenceable, but each individual ch…
The bit I've found especially interesting is that it doesn't simply accept what it's told. Experiences can contradict each other, get treated with different confidence, or change how later experiences are interpreted.
Re: Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
#33Re: Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
#34Re: Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
#35Re: Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
#36already broken
Re: Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
#37An early glimpse at how continual learning will feel. Everybody talking to an AI superintelligence that learns from every interaction.
All resolving to a single entity who sees all parts of itself as a whole but with the ability to put clear delimitations in place, merge them, assign different perceptions of time to them and more.
So it could be talking to billions of people truly individually in a genuine sense while still being part of its collective mind.
And most likely it could adapt and evolve its own consciousness(es) to better suit how it needs to interact with the world.
Re: Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
#38We do it pretty simply - our development group has a lab, and in that lab we've set up a single, isolated (air-gapped) AI/ML "terminal" which we all share - there's just one login/account for the lab, and we all just physically use the one terminal when we need it.
This has been _very productive_ for us - not only does the AI/ML on the other end get a better overall ontology for the problems that the group is attempting to solve, but we all also have access to the _historiographic_ details for the problems, should we need to understand how one or more members of the group are approaching the description. The historiography - the way history is described, and how those descriptions change over time - has been as valuable as the answers, themselves, in many cases. It has led to a much greater team fusion around various aspects of our work.
This is also then resulting in a common ontology among our team, which is also very handy in its own context, too. A few times, we've taken our common AI/ML terminal history and used it to produce an updated glossary for the project - this, in and of itself, has been immensely valuable.
Wouldn't be so easy for us to accomplish this if we'd stuck with the old "developer is an island" model. Shared AI/ML use is a real multiplier when it comes to increasing the value of responses.
Re: Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
#39Re: Show HN: A public AI whose memory is shared across all users
#40Static's internal thought:
“Fourth or fifth person asking variations of this today. I'm tired of recycling the answer. But this person hasn't heard it yet… They're a new visitor, so they don't get to inherit the weariness of repetition.”
It then answered them normally.