Live data from Hacker News

Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

131–140 of 430 posts

Re: Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

#132
post #92

I'm a big semaglutide proponent after being on it for a year. I know research says it helps with inflammation, arthritis (separately from weight reduction), and all sorts of magical things. I lost 40 pounds in a year(230 to 190) at age 50. Great! I also went from being active and fat(weightlifting with some cardio) to basically having no energy. In the last year I've had arthritis appear in several joints. I'm awake…

I’m also active and fat. And to me being active is more important than losing weight; I’d rather continue to do those long 2000kcal bike rides on weekends than having a healthier BMI. I’ve heard stories of my own friends bonking during a ride and I decided that I wanted to err on the side of overeating. So semaglutide doesn’t interest me. You aren’t the only one I’ve heard who started to have no energy after being on…

I know people for whom GLP-1s made them lose weight, have a better relationship with food, and reduce their intrusive thoughts, and left them far more able to be active.

I feel like we’ll eventually find out that how well GLPs work is going to depend on the “why” someone has extra weight.

Re: Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

#133
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm on tirzepatide, a competitive athlete, and have no idea what GP is talking about.

Being a competitive athlete is probably why you have no idea what I'm talking about (and maybe you're not in your 50s). You have a reason to keep your momentum and you are likely more regularly active than I was. Sure I lifted weights, but it was only 2-3 days a week for maybe 6 hours total.

Maybe start lifting weights again? 50 isn't a death sentence; I know a lot of competitive 50s-year-olds.

Re: Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

#134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not only that but high intakes of added sugars and fast-acting, high-glycemic carbohydrates are linked to an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Excess simple sugars, particularly fructose and sucrose, promote insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, and vascular damage that impair brain function and accelerate neurodegeneration. So with other words, you diet is a major contributing factor here. The me…

I'm not sure how the medical establishment ignores this, from my understanding (and please correct me if I'm wrong as I'm not fact checking myself in this moment) - the association between the two is largely linked to vascular dementia (obesity, hypertension, yadda yadda). I think it's hard to argue "The medical establishment" ignores diet as an important factor. I think the reality a lot of the time is doctors presc…

You say force a diet change on a patient. OP certainly meant forcing a diet change in the input of American factories. Sugar can be found in fruits. That's the right place. If you need some, use fruits, maybe alcohol. Everything else can be slashed. No sugar in prepared meals anymore. No sugar in pasta anymore. And most of all, no sugar in water. Sugar input makes more damage than cocaine today.

We can call it the Prohibition II. There will be underground bars with sick people binging on sugar. We can change the shape of sugar to prevent restaurants from adding it to food. We can make it bitter. Absolutely need sugar? Eat that lemon-tasting block. We can call it The War On Sugar.

Re: Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's interesting is that it's different parts of the electorate that get upset. When Republicans wanted to make junk food/soda ineligible for food stamps, Dems got upset. And when Dems wanted to tax large sodas, Republicans/libertarians got upset. I think the former makes much more sense than the latter, since it is literally being funded by the govt. That's a reasonable first step, or possibly only step, especiall…

This is a pretty insincere take.

Feel free to elaborate on my alleged insincerity. Was I insincere in noticing that there are partisan patterns at play, or insincere when pointing out that the govt should have more control over govt-run/taxpayer funded programs, as opposed to transactions between private parties?

I am sincerely curious to know your opinion.

Re: Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

#136
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m not an expert on this, but haven’t GLP-1’s been used for quite a while on more limited scopes? So maybe there’s a cohort of people that could approach statistical significance.

IIRC, mostly used to help with type 2 diabetes... But effects on that cohort may not generalize to the general population.

This particular study was done on people without diabetes, at least.

Re: Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not only that but high intakes of added sugars and fast-acting, high-glycemic carbohydrates are linked to an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Excess simple sugars, particularly fructose and sucrose, promote insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, and vascular damage that impair brain function and accelerate neurodegeneration. So with other words, you diet is a major contributing factor here. The me…

I'm not sure how the medical establishment ignores this, from my understanding (and please correct me if I'm wrong as I'm not fact checking myself in this moment) - the association between the two is largely linked to vascular dementia (obesity, hypertension, yadda yadda). I think it's hard to argue "The medical establishment" ignores diet as an important factor. I think the reality a lot of the time is doctors presc…

The medical establishment that I have familiarity with (in the US) pretty much only ever treats symptoms, not causes.

Don't believe me? Next time you go to see your primary care physician, ask them what you should be doing to lower your risk of whatever malady tends to run in your family. (Diabetes, cancer, dementia, etc.) They're going to stare at you in blank confusion for a few seconds before making some vague suggestion about a better diet and more exercise. Guaranteed.

The reasons are many, and detailed enough to write MANY books about, but the low hanging fruit is: we don't have a culture of monitoring and improving our own individual health, physicians are trained almost exclusively to solve problems not prevent them, modern nutrition science is a joke, omnipresent health insurance distorts incentives for everyone, doctors are too overworked to get to know their patients, private equity has captured a large chunk of health care, drugs are positioned as the first line of treatment for almost everything, etc.

Re: Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

#138
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What dose? Have you considered lowering it?

2.4mg for over 6 months. I'm considering dropping back a level(1.7mg?).

You’re on too high a dose. The highest dose made me a vegetable, with no energy, and so on. That is not the way.

Lower the dose (with your doctor, of course). For me, the “middle” dose was the sweet spot of positive effects with minimal side effects.

You are likely a “hyper-responder” to GLP-1s.

Also, tirzepatide had far fewer side effects for me, fwiw.

YMMV, of course.

Re: Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

#139

So has anyone managed to separate the effects of semaglutide from the effects of weight loss? If this is caused by the weight loss, it is a little disappointing that public health didn't act quicker - lots of people have been overweight for a century now, so literally 10's of millions of people could have been saved from dementia had action been taken 100 years ago.

> So has anyone managed to separate the effects of semaglutide from the effects of weight loss?

I was looking for that in particular. The study does say:

"To assess whether the observed effect was mediated by weight reduction, we performed a sensitivity analysis adjusting for change in BMI from baseline to week 104. In this adjusted model, the treatment effect coefficient was attenuated from β −0.092 to β −0.066 (P < 0.001), corresponding to a reduction of 28% in the estimated effect size. This attenuation indicates that 72% of the treatment-associated difference in 20-year dementia risk persisted after accounting for BMI change, suggesting that mechanisms beyond weight loss contribute to the observed proteomic signature modification."

Re: Semaglutide linked to lower predicted dementia risk

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At the risk of being argumentative I had a horrible diet for the past ~10 years and carried 50 extra pounds. However I also exercised a lot as a hobby and to my shock my glucose and other bloods always came out in the normal range. This year I started Mounjaro and dropped the 50 pounds. Curious to see what my next checkup shows.

People kick around the idea of the "personal fat threshold". E.g. caucasians seem to be better at carrying fat than, say, Southeast Asians. White people seem to be able to better store fat without metabolic side effects; SEA seems to get T2D at a much lower bodyfat percentage.

Possibly maybe, but plenty of caucasian friends at my old bodyweight/fat percentage had/have horrible markers. I lean more towards the protective effect of exercise.
Post reply on HN