11–20 of 64 posts
I think it should be a case whereby if you use AI and there are flaws in your prosecution or defence, it should be thrown out. This is another situation whereby nuance is not handled by AI.
I'm not a lawyer, but if there are (severe enough) flaws in the filings the case can be thrown out already. Adding a clause for AI-generated flaws does nothing.
What are the opinions of those here on using AI for court rulings? To me, it seems truly frightening that a Silicon Valley company could be placed in such a direct position of trust and influence over the legal system. There are examples of AI acting in its own self-interest over the wants of its masters, so I do wonder how it would handle cases against its respective company, or things which would directly impact it…
Imagine thinking that you can sue a strategically important to the US gov trillion dollar company and win.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not a lawyer, but if there are (severe enough) flaws in the filings the case can be thrown out already. Adding a clause for AI-generated flaws does nothing.
It would be important to add as it removes the proof of competency of the lawyer if using AI to aid the case.
It might be as simple as a clerk doing "select all" and noticing the extra selection?
Or what else?
I wonder how the court became aware of this attempt? It might be as simple as a clerk doing "select all" and noticing the extra selection? Or what else?
I wonder how the court became aware of this attempt? It might be as simple as a clerk doing "select all" and noticing the extra selection? Or what else?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would be important to add as it removes the proof of competency of the lawyer if using AI to aid the case.
What happens if AI becomes more competent than lawyers at law? Should then 100% human fillings be thrown out automatically?
Until then...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not a lawyer, but if there are (severe enough) flaws in the filings the case can be thrown out already. Adding a clause for AI-generated flaws does nothing.
It would be important to add as it removes the proof of competency of the lawyer if using AI to aid the case.